Sunday, December 29, 2019

version 3 plus 1

3 plus 1 - don't you mean 4?

No, I mean 3 plus 1

Er...

Now kindly allow me to proceed.

...

What are you doing Zie?

I'm waiting for you to proceed.

With utterly no regard for the effect your "waiting" has on the field.

Er...

I've gotta go.

Hey -- you can't just leave me hanging like that.

really

After all this anticipation.

What bl---y anticipation.

three plus this one -- getting nowhere. It's enough to break a man's heart

Men don't have heart's -- idiot. Women have hearts, not men.

Xesist.

Here -- try these on and save me your political sentiments.

These -- glasses?

What else.

Oh.

Yes. You see?

I suppose I do... You're right.

Not for the first time.

Women have hearts -- not men.

Correct

And men have brains.

Yes -- just don't try explaining that to anyone who isn't able to see through these.

Not able to? What's the difficulty -- putting on a pair of glasses is hardly a problem.

No, if you have a quantum activation chip in your conscious-ness.

What?

Only kidding. There's no physical chip.

Thank God for that.

It's all good old fashioned psycho-biology.

??????????????

And now that I've kept you between states of

Hey -- wake up sleepy.

Sorry -- I'm not handling this very well, am i.

Maybe you should try getting more than three hours sleep a night.

Should -- but then again -- that's hardly going to compel me to reinvent reality on the other side of conscious-awareness -- is it.

Er...

Whereas extreme fatigue, like extreme hunger or deep meditative panoramic awareness -- these are all conducive to bringing other from the background forwards into prime scope.

Er...

In with the old, out with the new.

Weren't you meant to say...

You see -- you knew!

Knew what?

What i was supposed to say.

Well, it's logical isn't it.

Really?

.0 i assume so.

It's happened again.

What?

Genius. You've referenced the other, previous versions of this dialogue.

previous? What previous  versions.

The ones you know nothing whatsoever about -- but which you've still managed to reference.

Er... if you say so.

Out with the old, in with the new.

Deja vu.

Talk about anti-climactic.

.-- 0 was I supposed to react differently.

No -- that will do perfectly, thank you very much.

Really.

Absolutely. 01:01

Already -- time's up.

.-- affirmative.

01:02

-1

absolutely

.0

th3

strike three

3

an appeal to symmetry -- cheap, base

l.o

comments -- behind you, at the periphery of your awareness is a fertile crescent waiting to come into view -- just as long as you cease placing all your pieces symmetricaly

symmetrically

symectricly -- and give her -- the wild one time enough, and space, to nest under the eaves of your thatched roof.

Does it have to be?

Not necessarily -- but then again -- if it bothers you -- there's reason in that, in't there.

In that case, yes, you're right

.0 please, quel horreur

let it be thatched, wantonly

and your -le are being held in safe keeping -- until the mind is willing to let go of nota bene -- what is dattery...

indeed, quel surprise -- "le" credited likewise to our friends in good standing

marching up and down the lists of i.0

nfi.

ni.0

t.0 0.y

____________________________________:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

1 comment: