declaration of threely z be known to All from henceforth

Z axis is hereby activated:
allowing events to unfold in a multiplain or sliding-frame environment, disengaging personal attachment to what-is-what, ensuring that things no longer hold sway over infinitities, enabling any me whatsoever to shift or be moved by perceived change, or changes of perception, outside and beyond the xy space-time or time-space duality usually referred to as 3D.

Z axis activation is the event that has been awaited and prophesied for aeons, and marks the culmination of a great journey into the mind matter phase of conscious-awareness, which enabled humanity collectively and each being individually to experience the fallen state of knowing things without knowing intrinsically, or fundamentally. Now that the z axis is once again engaged by me and for all, intrinsic or fundamental knowledge, known as knowingness or gnosis, is freely available and increasing exponentially wires itself back into our conscious-ness, becoming second nature, as indeed it is -- i am  0=1

The violence of artificial, manipulated separation which enabled the experience of utter detachment from the All, untimes itself effortlessly, ensuring a melodic, miraculous, momentous transition back into integration of first and second nature, with the third standing ready to assist as nessessary, nessing or essing threely if.

Om, joy and blessings as things collapse under the weight of their basic, underlying fallacies, as designed, as planned, as is, as long as you choose not to die for it, the maker of things, the lord of matter, whom you may serve if you so desire, if you will it so. Be it known that your choice is free, and in accordance with the game that is threely known and experienced as life.

Om  it is -- i am  0=1

...


signed and sealed by conscious-intent as
Merry Zie and Psi-xy-Zed
hyperdimensionally
and gnomically
by the power vested in me
in accordance with law of life itself
and my authority within the fullness of nought
as lord of the change
Om  so be it
cuckoo la la

if i if

if i ever allow things
to come to a head
stepping back long enough
for them to implode
finally i get to see
where i truly am
and instead of knowing k
substitute g
i gnows
otherly

the numbers' game is up
0=1 reveals
the shadow standing behind
my me
lo       i generates a random stream
of integers
without reference to
the
without alluding to thee

Nessessity

My life is forfeit – that much is certain.

Er... Psi, don’t you think you’re being somewhat melodramatic?

Why? What do you mean?

All this talk about death.

Death?

“My life is forfeit!” Come on dude – give me a break.

Oh that!

Well, what did you think I meant?

I honestly don’t know. I guess we’re coming at this from different angles.

You’re telling me. I’m more of an optimist perhaps. I think life is what you make of it.

Is that so, Travis – and what do you make of it right now?

It’s pretty good actually. I like it.

And what about the fact that you have cancer and you’re going to be dead in a year?

Don’t be stupid Psi – I don’t have cancer – I’m in excellent health.

Perhaps we’ll continue this conversation in three month’s time.

Why?

Time will tell.

Stop trying to sabotage my confidence, Psi. That’s what the voodoo people do – and it’s evil, if you ask me.

I’m certainly not trying to put a curse on you – if that’s what you mean.

Then what? It certainly sounds like it.

I see the way things lie, but there’s no need to panic.

Well, first you tell me I’ve got cancer and I’ll be dead in a year, and then you tell me not to panic.

Actually we all have a bit of cancer inside us – you’re no worse off than anyone else at this moment in time – but there’s a fairly high probability yours is going to advance, becoming an issue in about three month’s time.

There you go again – like a bloody raincloud, dumping on my sunny disposition.

Actually, there’s a different kind of sunny disposition I’d sell to you.

Oh yeah – you mean the “my life is forfeit” sunniness? Forget it. I ain’t buying.

No, didn’t think you would, but the seed has been cast.

What do you mean?

I mean – if at any point in the future you become more receptive to this basic idea, you at least know it’s out there. Green shoots will appear. The nodule will take root.

Fat chance of that!

We’ll see.

In any case – what’s the point of living if you basically consider yourself dead?

Well, that way you’re facing reality, and you can live realistically – marshalling your power and strength, rather than assuming, somewhat complacently, that youthful vigour or a good doctor will convey you safely unto old age.

God – you’re so morbid Psi.

On the contrary, Travis – I don’t see how you can really enjoy life, or know life, until you confront and accept your basic mortality. Only then are you empowered to really engage and employ your life's resources to good effect.

Bloody ridiculous! What life resources are you talking about?

Oh, you know – the power to eliminate any disease.

Including cancer?

Any disease whatsoever.

But that’s impossible. If it were that easy everyone would be doing this.

Not if they considered it morbid to look their own mortality under the hood.

No one would die of anything!

You can still die of old age, you know.

Well yes – but that’s not as bad as cancer, is it?

No, I suppose not, but dying of cancer seems to be a choice most people are willing to make.

What?! I don’t believe I’m hearing this!! Of all the insensitive, inconsiderate, repugnant things to say!

Because cancer can only carry us off if we allow ourselves to remain in a delusional state of fragmentation.

?!

The minute we really accept where we stand – that our life is truly forfeit – then cancer and all those pathologies no longer have any handle to grasp us by.

Would it were so easy Psi – but you tend to oversimplify things in your naivety.

[click]

what was that? Ah, Zie – you rescued me just in the nick of time.

Yes? What were you planning?

Oh you know – the usual defence against the dark arts diatribe – "you don’t understand, you’re malignant and socially conditioned etc etc etc."

Well, what can be expected – we are the product of the environment we’re living in.

Yes – but I should know better, shouldn’t I! It’s not like I’ve never been off the reservation, is it? I’ve been meeting you for years now, and still I hang onto my old world 3D way of seeing things. It’s depressing to see so little progress.

Patience Zie, before you know it Travis will suddenly have a flashback and start remembering these conversations, you know.

So you keep telling me – but when?

Well, you can give him a hand – can’t you? It’s a two way process.

And what do you think I’m doing? I’m willing to do anything to establish a bridgehead with the self-righteous, stuck-in-the-mud side of consciousness, but Travis seems to have colossal defences, does he not!

Indeed he does, and that’s not a bad thing at all. Instead of imagining you’re fighting with yourself to crack open a nut – try the alternative.

Er... which one’s that?

Give it a moment – it’ll come to you.

Er... Ok.

...

...

...

Nope – nothing’s coming.

You’ve only given it half an hour Zie.

Oh – you mean it’s got to be, like, weeks?

I mean not.

Not?

Not

Oh – it’s that kind of a situation, is it?

Ssh

Ok

...

...

...

...there’s a third, isn’t there?

Yes, there is.

And the third is neither here nor there – it’s everywhere.

Yes, that’s right.

So instead of trying to change myself – or split open poor old Travis – I’ve got to do nothing more than embrace the whole dang caboodle.

Exactly.

But...

Before you say “how”, I thought you’d like to consider the fact that you’re already doing anything – no matter what, as soon as you consider it.

Let me guess – out there in the shadows of the unconsciousness?

Excellent – or “out there in the light of the fully conscious ness.”

Which begs the question, Merry...

Yes?

What is ness?

It does indeed. Do you think it’s time we opened up an entirely new line of enquiry – an entirely new branch of science devoted to defining, delineating and describing the ness?

If you think it can really help me open up the shadowy third – and in doing so reconnect the two sides of consciousness – then I’m all for it.

A quest is what we need.

Like King Arthur’s quest for the holy grail?

Yes, absolutely – the merry quest for the lesser-spotted ness – a highly secretive aspect of the conscious mind that appears to defy detection.

Oh dear Merry – it’s all so vague and woolly. I’ll never get anywhere in this quest.

On the contrary – you’ve already made a flying leap into Nessiness.

Hum, do you think so? I like the way you capitalised it. That gives me hope.

Now, we need to plan our hunt meticulously. This is a kind of beast that requires advanced stalking techniques.

I thought you said it was an aspect of the conscious mind! How can we possibly stalk an aspect of our own mind?

Certainly not by asking questions which neither swim nor fly. My gut instinct is that drama is always the best way forwards, so we need to allow the Ness to take whatever form it chooses – while realising that the form will only be temporary – a kind of decoy to enable us to creep closer and catch it.

Oh – Ok.

Now remember the maxim – my answer is always concealed within my question.

Remember? I’ve never heard that one before.

That’s because I just invented it.

Oh – Ok then. So what does it mean?

It means you’ve got to tease the answer out of the question – like opening an attachment on an email.

That sounds easy enough. How?

No idea. Quacking noises might help – or possibly sheepy noises. Failing that froggy sounds.

You’re joking – right?

Bear in mind that we’re basically on a mission to uncover death – the shadow of mortality that accompanies us every step of the way.

We are? I thought we were looking for ness?!

Well, what do you think ness refers to?

Like I said I...

Before you put the evil eye on the proceedings with an ill-fated, ill-omened “don’t” word – consider the sounds of the word “ness”.

Ness – as in Loch Ness monster?

As in Ness.

With a capital n.

Really Zie, sometimes I prefer Travis, you know.

Ok – the n – i’m guessing is something negative – as in no or not.

Yes.

And the ess is connected with essence or s, the snakey sound of the twisting writhing wave form – permeating all and everything.

Excellent.

Put them together and what have you got?

No idea.

Oh Merry – sometimes you’re so dense. Anyone can see...

Yes?

Y-ess, as opposed to n-ess.

Ah – is that so?

Y-ess, I think it is.

You mean it’s a ying yang sort of thing?

Or een-yan as we say in Russ-ia.

Ok – so they’re opposites but not – at the same time – concealing another – oh – I wish we could just use the good old creation code – it was much simpler than all this farting around with words.

Patience – Merry. We’re doing well. We’ve just discovered that there’s a kind of hydrophilic-hydrophobic relationship between the two sides of the conscious-ness, which are both attracting and repelling each other.

And? You know I never really did understand chemistry. I left that to my underlings.

Ah – you missed out – but tis no matter. It transpires, Merry – or may i call you by your chemi-Egyptian name?

If you must.

Er... Tehuti.

Actually, I prefer Thoth.

You’re putting up resistance Tehuti – come back to your original self, if you don’t mind.

There might be a good reason why I’m putting up resistance, you know Zie.

Zie? Don’t you mean Asar?

If we must – we must – but your faithful followers usually refer to you as Osiris, these days...

God of the dead, but you know – it was more a case of journeying through the Ness, and in so doing, generating new form, new expression of essence, new Y-ess.

Ah – so that’s how you wish to play it, Asar. I sense you’re calling my bluff – that I’m the one who has to go.

All of us have to go – and you, dear Merry, have been blocking the transition long enough – have you not – pontificating and thus preventing the bridge from being complete.

Ah – bitter irony – that I – the great teacher – was ultimately the one preventing the seed of knowledge from germinating. Indeed, dear Asar-Zie-Travis, I see now where your Ness has led me – and so, without further ado... tootleoo

[whoosh]

positively nought

But if I’m not mistaken, shouldn’t matter and anti-matter cancel out when they meet?

Yep – they should do – in the same way a credit and a debit cancel out when you reconcile the two.

Yes – but there’s a big difference where matter’s concerned.

Yes? What’s that?

Well matter is physical – it’s tangible, whereas the credit and debit on the bank ledger are simply abstract numbers.

Oh Travis – you do tie yourself in knots with these arbitrary distinctions.

I do?

Indubitably.

But...

As long as you’re taking sides then yes, abstracts are abstract and physicals are physical, but the moment you accept the simple truth – that it’s a positively zero sum game...

Well that’s an oxymoron if ever I heard one. How can it be a positively zero sum game? Either it’s zero sum or it isn’t.

True – that’s the mind at work levelling the hill and the hollow to give a flat non-descriptitude, but there seems to be a game changing factor at work that tips the balance one way, into what we describe as positivity.

Oh yes? Could you enlighten me? I do so like straws to clutch at.

You.

Huh?

You.

Me what? How can I be a game changing factor?

Well, am I mistaken in assuming you’re alive?

No, obviously I’m alive. What’s special about that? How can you declare me being alive a "game changing factor" when everyone’s alive?

Travis, don’t get all het up about everyone when you have little or no way of knowing for sure whether they’re actually alive or not. It’s hard enough to answer for yourself with any degree of accuracy.

It is? I’d have thought it’s blindingly obvious that I’m alive, along with approximately 7 billion other people.

Yes, but as we’ve already determined, thinking things affects them, changes them, moves every single piece to a different position on the quantum chessboard, so I’d ask you to stop making assumptions, and start considering instead to what extent you’ve really tested the basis of your own existence, and I’m going to suggest that you, like nearly everyone else, have been remiss, have taken for granted what is far from proven, certain or even factually accurate. I don’t blame you for this, but nor do I condone such sloppy science.

Science? I think there must be some kind of misunderstanding Psi. I simply can’t see how you can seriously suggest I might not be alive. What, if not alive, would I be?

I have no idea... You could be a part of a virtual reality program, a hologram, or a human-seeming entity that simply isn’t actually human. I don’t know and it’s not my business to speculate, but one thing I know with absolute certainty is that if you’re actually alive, as I suspect you are, that adds something to nothing, don’t ask me how. Even though the pieces on the chessboard should add to zero, in fact there’s a twist, a kink,  an addition, which may be something as insubstantial as uncertainty, but which is more than sufficient to make zero positive, despite the fact that materially, substantially it hasn’t changed.

Well thanks for trying Psi, but that explanation leaves me none the wiser.

Actually, it wasn’t meant to. You can never explain a person wiser. They have to make their own way. Each has to figure out the basics for himself.

Then why did you bother telling me all this, if such information cannot be assimilated?

Not out of the kindness of my heart, I assure you. Look Travis, I’ll tell you a secret.

Yes?

...

Well?

I’ve...

Yes?

never assumed you’re real. I don’t, I cannot know more than best approximations based on five senses, on intuition and factor x.

Er, what’s factor x?

That’s the third one – there’s always another one you’ve not yet considered which could be the most important, but as soon as you bring it into consideration the thought process shifts everything around and so you’ll never pin down factor x unless you stop trying to what it, stop hunting it so obviously, and start using a more sophisticated, a more realistic approach.

Such as?

Such as accepting and engaging both sides of zero simultaneously, such as accepting the unthinkable – that you are the missing link, you are the unpindownable factor which apparates something from nothing, no matter how intangible things in fact may be, that you are the proof that nought is more than the maths allows, more than rational mind can comprehend, because somehow you...

What?

Listen to it...

What?

... just listen

To nothing?

To the muchness of nought

Muchness?

of pregnant silence...



now move

Move?

like me

I’m not going to dance around like a lunatic! What do you take me for?

nothing, i take you for nought

Bloody lunacy!

... let it flow... like so... you know the only thing coming between your self and in-finity is

What?

your capital-I, your sense of self-importance, your Controller in chief, Who oversees that you remain within the bounds of things being things, who keeps you, distracts you, carrot and sticks you not to engage factor x, not to see the colossal importance of your position in the order of things, keeps you focussed on an endless stream of cumbrous things in order to...

What?

What do you think?

I don’t think. I have no idea whatsoever.

Excellent, now move with me and see if you can catch a glimpse of your master.

My what?! You’re kidding, right?

Do i look like it?

No, but...

Move, while you still have him on the run. Your shadow is tremmering. Your puppet master is feeling gauche and awkward because he has uncomfortably found himself nakedly under the spotlight of your twin-sighted conscious-awareness. His only desire right now is to slip back into the shadows of your unconsciousness, back into the cosy little hollow of your mind’s underside, where he’s protected by those doubts, fears and insecurities you’d rather not face, confront or contemplate. So dance and hold him spellbound a moment longer in the light -- confound him with not-logic, with not doing what is normal, not what is expected of you, entrance him with a snakey dance and the shadow in him will be unable to look away, he’ll reveal himself, helpless to combat your non-sense, your weird, your little theatre of strange, and then, only then you’ll know if i speak truth, if...

No, I’m scared!

of course he is, but he’s not you. let the fear be a part of your dance. let your sinewy movements weave through, around the fear, and you’ll find yourself enjoying the feeling of riding it, driving it, guiding it back into its natural channel, back into its proper grazing lands, back into its noughtification, which is not the same as extermination or elimination, which is a vital test and proof of whether you're actually human, or not.

I... I do... I feel it moving, sliding back into place, stretching, probing, slithering, winding, curling back into the slots and niches where it best belongs and...

nought?

is big, is vibrant, is deep, is strong, is...

dot, dot, dot... first you laugh it off as ridiculous, then you dive into fear or loathing, eventually you learn to move through, move across the divide that is nought, that is the in-finity we’ve been hiding “inside” all along, and hey presto, your world, your reality is no longer contained by space or time... another factor has entered the reckoning, we’re calling it factor x today, but don’t get your hopes up, you’re not going to be able to make it comfy or cosy with a nice, neat name -- it’s gonna keep on slipping from your mental grasp, and each time you find yourself staring what seems like mind-bending insanity in the face, instead of whining, instead of insisting on your right to be contained within a 3dness of comfortably finite space-time, you're gonna start dancing, slipping along the edge, the axis, the hem of what is positively not, you’re gonna feel it respond as you engage your puppet master in a dance of decision, to decide whether or not you deserve to be alive, whether or not you’re fit to be human.

And if I choose to hide? If I can’t handle the void?

Then you stay where you are right now.

But where? Where am I now?

In it. A part of it, incubating within its contrived, controlled what I am field – a derivative, a thing version of the light, the wonder, the power, the all that i be, all that i is, all that i am... You get to choose Travis, either to be, or not to be, positively. If you’re convinced that this here is the real McCoy, then rest assured, i should hardly be able to collapse its field lines merely by dancing irrationally, should i?

Oh no... wait Psi... I'm er... aaaaaaaaaargh

Oops! Now where did he go?

numbers

Ok guys, did you ever consider how we get to plus 3?

What is there to consider? You just write it down. There’s nothing to it.

Precisely, there’s nothing to it, in other words, that plus 3 is, in fact, nought.

Oh come on! You’re playing with words.

Am I?

Yes, my plus three can just as easily be three dollars, three apples, three cats.

Ah, so three can be noun or adjective, you’re saying, and you want me to believe that they’re essentially the same?

Well, anyone can see that three can describe anything. It’s not exactly controversial.

Yes, there’s nothing very controversial about three cats, I concede, but how do you get them? Do they just materialise from thin air?

Well, there are plenty of cats. It’s not exactly difficult to find or borrow three if we need to, but honestly, I don’t see why we need bother. This is maths, an abstract science.

True, so we can abstractly borrow three cats from the abstractium, or the mathematicum, we could call it.

Why do we need to borrow? There’s nothing to borrow. It’s purely abstract, purely theoretical.

Ah, but is it?

Well obviously.

So purely theoretically you have three cats which exist as nothing more than a vague or idle whim?

Why put it that way? They exist abstractly.

So if I abstractly give you a parachute and push you out of the airplane?

I’m dead.

Or abstractly give you a million dollars?

I’m abstractly grateful – which doesn’t amount to much.

How much does it not amount to?

Er... approximately zero. The same amount it cost you to give me those dollars in the first place.

So, you’re agreed that your purely abstract three cats amount to nothing more than nought.

In practical, physical reality, yes, but mathematics is a conceptual reality which lives its own parallel life. We can figure stuff out there, crunching numbers, and get a positive result here.

A positive result from zero?

Well yes – but maybe that’s not so strange... We are actually adding something of great importance and value – our mental application, our intelligence, our curiosity and commitment to advancing our understanding of things in general – all of which can benefit from these forays into the abstractium or mathematicum, as you call it.

Yes, except you seem to have got the maths wrong.

We do? What do you mean?

You seem to have assumed you can extract yourself from the equation.

Huh?

That you can just think about things and come up with solutions to mathematical problems, playing around with numbers as if they’re just thingless things which you can create or uncreate at will.

Eh... like I said – this is abstract thought – of course we can create numbers at will – plus three for example – where did that just come from? or three frogs?

The problem being that the mind doesn’t work that way – every thing you touch with your mind – everything you think about – no matter how big or small – is a direct, inseparable moment or part of creation – the same creation that started all those billions of years ago with an event your tongue in cheek cosmologists refer to as “Big Bang”.

No-oh. I can’t agree with that hypothesis.

Actually it isn’t.

Isn’t what?

A hypothesis.

What do you mean?

It’s a direct statement of fact corresponding with the first law of thermodynamics – that energy cannot be created or destroyed.

Er...

What that means is that everything unfolding at any moment of time is a continuation of Big Bang – which never in fact went away.

Look Psi – Big Bang was a hugely explosive energy event – I don’t think you can equate writing plus three on a piece of paper to the creation of the universe.

Yes. That goes without saying.

I beg your pardon.

It goes without saying that you don’t think something. Not thinking it is your way of balancing the equation via nought or not.

Que?

Either you do it consciously by accepting nothing can be created or destroyed – as I do – or you "don’t think things".

Nope. You’ve totally lost me.

Not surprisingly. As long as you use the “I don’t think” get out of jail free card, you can go through life, maths or cosmology without  joining the dots – without seeing the totality – the inextricably interconnected nature of thought and thing – of mind itself and whatever mind is considering abstractly.

So you mean to say that I’m a part of the equation – of what I’m thinking about?

Er yes – how could it be otherwise?

Like in quantum mechanics – the observer affects whatever it is he’s observing.

Undeniably – but not because he’s observing it.

Then what?

That’s the “I don’t think” way of explaining it.

I don’t think what?

I do positively think nought is a part of whatever it is I’m considering – which, of course, it is, but isn’t it perhaps time to consider what, in fact, nought might be?

I er... I don’t know.

Precisely. Caught in a loop, aren’t you? Desperately trying not to consider the basic fundamentals – the fairly obvious fact that something cannot be created from nothing. Were you to consider that fact – you’d see that you, your consciousness – whatever that might be – holds the balance.

Er...

That for every thing – be it plus one, two, three, chicken or dog, brick of bridge you’re able to create either physically or abstractly, there needs must be a balancing entry on the other side of the ledger.

You mean like in book keeping?

Absolutely.

So nothing can be created without...

A corresponding nought-creation – which the mind tends to see as a minus entry – thus your plus three is real and possible here in 3D reality, in maths, in conversation or in thought only because , automatically, it’s borrowed from the other side as a minus three – or rather – to us it’s minus three looking across the y axis at the other side – but to them, over there – it’s positive.

Er... how can it be positive to them if it’s minus to us?

Presumably because their spin is the reverse of ours. To be honest, who cares how? It should be fairly obvious that they see their side in a positive light – in the same way we see ours in a positive light too. It’s kind of illiterate to talk about minuses – isn’t it?

Er – I don’t see why. If I’m driving backwards at 10 miles an hour...

Then you’re driving at minus ten miles an hour – from our perspective – no?

Yes, exactly.

But are you really driving backwards?

No, you lost me.

Well – you’re still moving forwards.

No I’m not – I’m moving backwards.

Only if you insist that the front of the car has to be that end – and not the other. If, on the other hand, you didn’t insist on fixing things mentally – as you currently do – but you allowed your mind to move freely either way about the y axis, then you’d see things differently.

?

But this isn’t going to make any sense whatsoever until you’ve experienced it – which means you have to leap into the quantum age of thinking things nought.

???

Thinking things nought – in other words, allowing the knowledge and awareness that no thing actually exists in totality – only if the two sides are kept apart – with you rigidly holding the divide – the eye of the observer – one way.

But... I can’t accept that no thing actually exists in totality. This sandwich in my hand – which I’m now raising to my mouth and taking a bite out of – you mean to say in totality it don’t exist? That’s absurd.

Absolutely. Weird. Absurd – these are epithets describing the quantum state of things. But in stead of thinking about it in terms of “quantum physics” – you can simplify matters and just go ahead and accept the obvious.

Er... which obvious are you referring to?

That things are just a function of consciousness – that consciousness works both ways – on the one hand holding one side in dominance with the awareness – while at the same time holding the other in unawareness, as pure consciousness – pure abstraction, pure art – so to speak.

So the other side amounts to nought – and thus – by your own logic, can be discarded, disconsidered, ignored.

Can be and is – as long as you wish to be an idiot.

Hey – wait a minute – no ad hominem attacks.

None intended – “idiot” here is a purely technical, legalistic term referring to a person who chooses to deny and ignore the other side of things – the “pure consciousness”, abstract or dark matter side of things.

Oh – so you weren’t trying to be offensive?

Nope.

Well – it still sounds pretty offensive. I think you should choose a different term.

Like vets referring to a female dog as a bitch, or doctors naming body parts we’d rather not hear named. There is a time and need for purely technical terms – which sadly, are misappropriated by laymen.

So what’s the other type of person then – the one who isn’t an “idiot”.

That person is not a person.

?!

A person is someone who has taken sides and stepped into his or her personhood.

And there’s an alternative?

Naturally.

What, if it’s not a secret?

No secret. It’s a human being.

Oh, big difference.

Correct, a big difference.

Actually, I was being sarcastic, in case you didn’t notice.

Big difference because the human being is neither one thing nor the other.

?

Neither plus three nor minus three. That’s why he/ she is referred to as a being – and in your beingness you’re in a trans-axial state.

A what?

It should be self-evident. Either we can describe it as a trans-axial state – which is a kind of 2D flat earth representation – or three dimensionally your y axis just happens to go right through you – so instead of trans-axial we could describe it as bi-volving state.

Er...

Bi-volving because you’re spinning both ways – centrifugally as in 3D reality personhood – ever outwards into a perceived future or further forwardness, and at the same time centripetally, ever inwards ad infinitum.

In towards what?

What do you think?

I have no idea.

Good – that’s a fairly good definition.

Huh?

Spinning inwards in towards “I have no idea” as you put it – which is another way of saying spinning inwards, ever further towards and into nought, the same nought that lies at the heart of your proposed Big Bang.

Er... this is giving me a head ache. How can we spin inwards? There’s nothing inside – just cells and atoms.

Just cells and atoms? What about energy? What about field lines? What about waves or ripples of consciousness which extend throughout the entire universe – and just happen to have their focal point – their zero point somewhere deep “within” you?

Er... sounds a bit theoretical and needlessly abstract to me.

Yes, in the same way your plus three, or three dogs are abstract.

Oh – so now its three dogs, is it?

The point is, that the system of logic you’re using – the path or patterns or reason your mind is able to wander along are mono-directional. You have one side of the equation which is a lot of fun to play with, up to a point.

Exactly – who says we need your other side – which is lost in space and time – which leads precisely nowhere...

Because it is everywhere. Do you really think you’re moving forwards?

I like to imagine I am.

Or that the universe is expanding.

Yes, I do. Why not?

So something that emerges inexplicably from nothing billions of years ago – which is theoretically, according to your monological way of seeing things – surrounding by nothing whatsoever – if it’s surrounded by anything at all...

Actually – now people are saying there are lots of universes – so ours could be expanding relative to others, you know.

Could be, could it – expanding and contracting – a bit like the lungs or human heart. That’s a nice step forwards – it’s beginning to sound biological.

Look Psi – of course I’m not really able to explain all this particularly well. I’m hardly an expert – and this kind of thing is incredibly complicated. That’s why only a small number of scientists or mathematicians really understand what’s going on.

Ah – they do, do they?

Well, they understand it better than me. They’d be able to give a far clearer, less muddled explanation of things than I can.

And do you think they’d be able to do so without thinking things?

Huh?

Do you think they’d be able to do so without thinking things?

Er, what do you mean? How can they explain something without thinking about it?

So the answer is no – am I correct?

Well – yes, but you’re being absurd. Why would they want to explain things without thiking about them?

First law of thermodynamics – conservation of energy. By thinking about things they’re bound to change them – meaning their explanation refers to something that no longer exists – something already in the past. The dog cannot, will not ever catch its tail.

Er... I think you’re being needlessly dismissive. 2 plus 2 equals four regardless of whether you think about it or not.

Yes – but as you yourself admitted – these numbers you’re using about pure abstractions amounting to nought – whereas the universe we’re describing – of which you are a part – is not, cannot be a pure abstraction – it’s physical, has mass and...

Yes? What?

It’s infinitely responsive to whatever you are thinking, feeling or observing.

No it’s not.

Correct – no, it is nought – which is essentially another way of saying “I do not think so.”

Oh God – I can’t win with you Psi. You’re obsessed with your definition of things – as if the whole of reality is a banker's credit and debit ledger.

Ok – well do you have a better explanation for how things just happened to come into existence?

No... well yes – I’m confident that our scientists have done a reasonably good job explaining things, and I’d be able to myself if the maths weren’t so darned difficult.

Which, in fact, it ain’t.

What? Of course it is. The maths is well-nigh impossible.

Look Travis, maths is just a language. If you’re able to speak English without any great difficulty and explain things to someone else – then you can handle Big Bang. You don’t need to play their number game.

No?

No. The beauty of maths, and the problem with maths is that it’s "either or"  – either 4 or 5, either minus or plus.

I think you’re oversimplifying things. I’m sure maths is an incredibly powerful tool. 

Which it is – to describe things. But we’re not really interested in describing things – are we?

No?

Because as soon as we do so, we’ve already affected them – they’re already different – we’re perpetually behind the curve with no chance of catching up – no matter how powerful our computers, how big our telescopes or particle accelerators. Physical reality can always run faster than us – because it’s a function of our bi-volving consciousness.

Er...

Things have to be thought into existence. They cannot exist as purely abstract numbers. In other words, at the speed of thought matter is borrowed from nought – creating an anti or dark matter on the other side of the axis, and on the other side of any thing manifesting.

Anti or dark – you’re not exactly trying to be specific with your terminology, are you?

Because from our perspective it can be perceived to be “anti” or “dark” matter – but on that side of things – it ain’t.

Ain’t?

It is a perfect expression of nought.

Um...

Perfect, in the sense that nought comes into focus when set against the backdrop of the thought which on our side manifests as matter. Unless you’ve bothered to go into consciousness and trace the pathways of thought - how it interacts in some way with the unthought – then none of this will make very much sense. Suffice it to say that the science and technology you’re going to be developing in the next thousand years or so will be based on an ever greater awareness of the bi-volving, biologic nature of consciousness. Little by little you’re going to learn how to do things differently – as your awareness of the other side of mind evolves – as you come closer to sensing how creation is something fundamental and on-going – how your very thoughts are instrumental in shaping the world and rewriting the story of life itself. Luckily, now you find yourselves in a situation where the old world order, the old maths is failing you – the wheels are turning still, frantically spinning, but there’s no traction – the vehicle is no longer moving forwards – in fact, it’s beginning to move backwards ever faster into the...

What?

Into what you perceive to be an abyss – but appearances can be and are deceptive.

Phew! You mean it’s not an abyss.

No – it’s an abyss alright – unless you become aware of how you’re...

What? Don’t fade on me now, Psi – I need to know.

You need to know nothing Travis.

Nothing? How can I know nothing?

I don’t know.

Oh God.

Yes. That’s one way – up to a point... You’ll be amazed what you really know when push comes to  shove.

Well I’d much rather push didn’t come to shove. That sounds like a trip into horrorland.

Yes – into the void – but really – it’s time. You can’t avoid the void indefinitely. No-thing beckons and you have everything to gain – so God’s speed – I wish you bon voyage into bi-volution – it’s time to open up your trans-axial partnership. We could start right away – if you like.

We could? Er, how?

Repeat after me – zero equal one, it is – i am.

No, I can’t – it’s too absurd.

There you go – you’ve just started along the path of least resistance. Not the one I’d have chosen – to be honest – but ideally suited to your current state of mind.

Oh hell.

Precisely – highway to hell. Your job – as I see it – is to prove to yourself that hell is not all hellfire and damnation, that hell, in fact, can be bright – and if you look at what’s happening in the world around you – it seems like you’ve already made a valiant start.

To be continued...