Tuesday, May 19, 2020

right you are


I’m breathing.


Er. Yes. I can see.



[Zie joins in, half-heartedly, for a minute or two]         And what?

No thing

Nothing?

What so ever

What you mean to say is you’re spacing out, letting it all go, embracing all that is.

Yes – you’re absolutely right.

I am?

Absolutely.

There’s a first time for everything. Wow. I feel kind of…

Pleasantly surprised, I imagine.

That’s it. Pleasantly surprised.

Or was.

Was what?

Breathing.

You were?

Till you came in.

Er…

And put a stop to all that.

I…

Don’t worry – it was definitely meant to be.

It was? Are you sure? 

It always is.

Really.

Absolutely.

You mean to say…

Yes, I do.

But I haven’t said it yet.

No, but you will.

But how can you possibly know what I’m going to say before I’ve even said it? 

I can’t, can I? That would be impossible, or supernatural.

So, you’ve just totally contradicted yourself.

Yes.

And that’s ok?

I’m not proud of the fact.

Then why do it?

Breathing.

Huh?

It’s breathing.

What is? Contradicting yourself?

The breathing takes you out of the "me" into "not exactly me" – the all that is – I think you called it.

Yes, I did.

And the all that is doesn’t really bother too much about politics or taking sides, does it? It's universal. 

Er… can’t say I’m overfamiliar with this particular phenomenon – but, kind of makes sense – it being “all that is” – but wouldn’t that imply you’re speaking for God? 

Could do. 

Sounds kind of presumptuous, if you don’t mind me saying.

By all means, say away. You're welcome to put me in my place. I wouldn’t want to be above criticism, would I – not if I’m truly breathing all that er... is

So heresy aside, this is like getting outside yourself and losing your sense of self-identity?

Could be. Can’t really say, can i?

Why not?

Without focussing on myself: kind of shorts the circuit, gets you back into me-ness, doesn’t it?

I… well I suppose so, logically, it would. 

So, let’s suppose it wasn’t exactly my identity speaking – let’s suppose it was "breathing all that is" – which isn’t really anything in particular, is it?

I can’t say I'm familiar – I’ve not done a lot of the breathing myself.

Oh you have.

Really? i have? 

Without being fully aware.

Oh – well that doesn’t really count, does it?

Really, that depends what it is you’re counting. So, let’s assume that there are concurrently two sides to everything you’re thinking – the side you know and identify with, the side you purposefully don’t.

Two sides. Ok... 

It means there’s a whole lot more going on than you or I realise – and whether you choose to access that “whole lot more” is entirely up to you.

So, it’s just kind of waiting in storage? 

Absolutely.

Waiting?

For you to breathe it, reconnect.

Well I don't see what the point is, really.

No?

I mean, breathing sounds great on paper, a bit of meditation to rebalance and de-stress.

A dark field of uncertainty.

Huh?

Which we really don't wish to experience – the great "not that"; everything we've secretly been avoiding, filing away for the rainy day we're determined not to experience.

Er...

Terrified of.

Merry, don't you think you're over-dramatising this? I mean, we mostly seem to be getting along well enough without your ominous sounding "dark field of uncertainty".

In lock down? With wars, disease, misery and even suicide rampaging throughout the human psycho-sphere?

Well, this is Earth after all. It's not meant to be perfect. It's a work in progress, warts and all.

It's a mathematical given.

Huh?

The natural product of light breath.

Light, as in?

Light as in light, breath as in breath. Either you breathe or you skip along, pretending you can get by without all that is, without not-that, the seemingly dark matter which terrifies the light version of me.

Well I think you're mistaken, Merry. Most people simply haven't the faintest idea how to do this breathing malarkey. We were never taught.

True, and utterly false.

Er...

True, you weren't taught.

So we're hardly to blame.

But then again, this is second nature, like a fish learning to swim, a bird taking to the air...

Well if that's so, then how come more people don't do it?

They do, without being aware, because you can't avoid the breath as long as you're alive.

I mean the full monty?

Choice.

Choice?

You're explorers.

Explorers?

You're scientists.

Scientists?

Absolutely, exploring, investigating the dark side of things.

I thought you said we're doing the light breath, avoiding the darkness.

Confusing, isn't it – you are, and thus you're exploring the dark side of things – investigating what happens when you disconnect from all that is, what happens when you use fear to catapult you ever further, ever deeper into unreality.

Er...

By negating your very basis, your essence, by not-thatting, until the path ends, the breath expires.

God. I can't believe how you twist everything round, turning day into night.

So, nothing could be simpler – to breathe wholly, naturally all-that-is is the default that restores equilibrium in an instant.

It does?

As soon as you stop disseminating disequilibrium, as soon as your decide your experiment is complete, you have all the data you need, that you've achieved your goal.

Our goal?

You've laid a psycho-experiential trail, or grid, you might say, across unreality – through Hades.

Really?

Absolutely.

Why?

Because you can – you wanted to take life or the life experience into unlife, like a mountaineer climbing into the oxygen-depleted death zone where his body starts rapidly deteriorating, in order to reach the summit and experience the edge, the penumbral shade of reality, of life itself.

And we've done it? We've reached the summit?

Affirmative, but only if you make it back alive, only if you remember to reconnect, to countermand the unbreath directive you ordered yourselves to follow.

But how? It's all we know.

No, it's all you remember, but you know all there is to know in the dark matter of breath.

?

In whatever you're afraid to face, afraid to encounter, afraid to experience.

?

You fear what you secretly know, and in your fear is the release that flicks the switch, that brings your awareness back.

?

Death, is what you fear, and death is the end of the reality you have completed.

So we have to die?

Absolutely, if you want to live.

To reconnect?

With all that is.

We have to put our trust in the unbearable lightness of breath?

Indeed.

It feels so impalpable.

Absolutely, but there are wings waiting to unfold.

But breath is so...

Yes, but it's your element – your all that is. Nothing less will do.

And we all have this access point to all-that-is – somewhere in the indecipherable matter of breath? 

Yes. The  dark matter of breath undarkens if we're willing to breathe "not that" – whatever we purposefully excluded, whatever undermines me, my flimsy certainties, my illusory impregnability. 

Sounds like the imperial death star approach to breathing. 

It's the "calling my bluff" approach, to test the ultimate hypothesis. 

Which is? 

You... the me.

?

The existential viability of your undivided me.

Meaning?

Whether or not you cancel out on recombination.

Er... And what if the hypothesis fails?

Then back to zero point you are. Finnagin beginnagin. But if it's undefendable why hang around pretending you're for real? Why the charade?

What?

Wasting the rest of your life defending s myth or a lie.

Er... Perhaps because I don't want to die.

Lame. You're dead until-unless you put your self into play, until you prove that the two sides match up critically, and that you're a viable version of reality.

Gulp.

It's the way. Thus it is – i am. "Not that" is your enemy no more than your friend.

You could have fooled me.

Not really.

Ok, ok, it's a figure of speech.

Oh right.

And this recombination you're talking about...

Yes?

Everything’s on file, nothing's ever lost or truly forgotten?

Absolutely not. It's like the blockchain: the entire universe ensures that your numbers add up, that you remain the sum of your past. All you succeed in doing, if truth be told, is Mandelbrotting deeper into your fractalisation. Why?

Including what I was about to say a few minutes ago?

As long as you’re in the breath that brings both yea and nay together, yes. 

And what? In that state you can  transcend all physical limitations? 

What is there to transcend?

So what was I going to say then? You seemed to imagine you already knew. You had the gall to say as much. 

... that nothing happens by chance. That everything is completely, utterly predictable. Yes, from the breath-is-me, that is true.

The breath is me? I thought it’s not me – that the breath in fact liberates us from me-ness.

Yes. That’s one side of it.

But the other side… the opposite?

Absolutely.

So you’re not actually saying anything – hedging your bets – covering both sides of the argument.

What argument?

Fair enough. But, supposing you’re right – supposing that was what I was about to say…

Supposing. 

Wouldn’t it be terribly dull? Knowing that everything is already planned – nothing is left to chance

Or free will? 

Exactly.

Yes, it would be.

There you go then. Why would anyone want to enter such a state of all knowingness? 

Why would anyone want to be God – you might say.

Yes. Why? What would be the point of being alive if we know everything anyone’s going to say?

Good question.

Well?

Well what?

Well what would be the point? It sounds like you’re beautiful breathing meditation is a kind of dystopian nightmare – a knowing everything and no longer having the benefit of being able to exercise choice or experience the unexpected.

Yes.

So it’s not the kind of thing anyone in their right mind would wish to access, is it?

Correct.

Am I missing something?

Yes.

What?

Half.

Huh?

Well, no one in their “right mind” would want to experience this all knowingness – would they?

We’ve already established that fact, haven’t we?

But then again, do you believe that your “right mind” is actually you – completely?

It’s a figure of speech. The right mind we’re talking about here is the sensible, logical, reasonable, rational mind.

Yes, that much is evident. The right mind is the right mind, and definitely, categorically not the left mind.

But who would want to go into the left mind if it’s the opposite of “sensible, logical, reasonable and rational” – it sounds like hell.

Correct.

You haven’t answered my question.

I thought you answered it yourself rather well.

I did?

You said, “It sounds like hell.”

Well, yes. And what?

Well, it sounds like hell from the perspective of the right mind, as well it should. How on earth could the right mind possibly like the sound of its antipode?

But look at the words – we’re not just talking about an alternative, are we – we’re talking about something illogical, irrational, unreasonable and senseless. Doesn’t that speak for itself?

Yes – it does.

So how could you defend a left mind? How could you suggest we should want to embrace it – if it actually exists?

If?

I rather suspect it’s just the absence of mind – a mindlessness. An unthinking, unknowing state.

Right.

There – you see. You agree.

Right, as in right mind.

Huh?

Confirmation bias.

Oh come on. You can’t really mean to say you’re willing to stand up and defend the left mind – if it’s everything that a healthy mind is not?

Defend – no. The left mind needs no defence. It is no criminal.

You make it sound like one.

The right mind and the words it attaches great importance to – create the impression, the certainty that the other side is no side at all, to be shunned and spurned no matter what – and that’s not necessarily incorrect.

Huh?

Am I contradicting myself?

Yes, I think you are.

Excellent. Then we’re probably close to the heart of the matter.

[sighing]

For the truth is never, in fact, antagonistic or oppositional – that’s just how it looks when we’re in a one-sided state of perception, and thus an incomplete-awareness.

Then what?

The breath – our very own infinity drive.

Er…

Because if and when we go total – then the other side of mind – whatever that may seem to be from a right-minded perspective, comes into perspective at the very same moment that the right side readjusts back into its rightful boundary slot – so the two integrate naturally, fully, imperceptibly.

It just happens?

Yes.

And what?

This.

What do you mean?

This brief dialogue is the fruit of that state.

It is?

Yes, for this dialogue rests upon the un-mind-fullness of infinity – the all that is.

Er… And what?

What?

What’s the benefit of this dialogue.

None whatsoever.

So there’s nothing to show for your twin-mindedness.

Absolutely. Apart from…

What?

You.

Me? What do you mean?

You only exist as a product of my all-full-ness.

I… no – there’s gotta be some kind of mistake.

Yes?

I exist in my own right.

Absolutely.

In my own right.

Absolutely. Twice. In your own right – but bear in mind that your own right is only half of your undivided truth – the same way my own left is only half of my truth.

You mean to say – that you’re actually from the other side – the devil’s very kitchen – the pit, the abyss of illogicality, unreasonableness, senseless irrationality.

One hundred percent.

But…

Yes?

You don’t seem all that bad. I mean – you contradict yourself a lot – which is annoying – very annoying in fact, but all in all – you’re not such a bad guy.

Pleased to hear it.

I’m not trying to be funny.

Not at all. You couldn’t even if you tried. You’re on the wrong side for real humour.

Hey, wait a minute – no need to insult me – I was trying to be nice.

Were you? Having stated that I’m as good as the devil – if I come from the evil side of the divide?

I didn’t know at the time – and for God’s sake – don’t take it so personally.

Ok. Good advice. Nothing personal. Do you wish to know the whole truth?

Er… I’m not sure.

You don’t.

I didn’t say that.

You do or you don’t?

Stop pressurising me. It’s difficult to say.

Oh – you’re making calculations even as we speak – “can I handle the truth without it changing me – because I wouldn’t want to lose my unique racial purity – the separateness that makes me not like him.”

Hey – stop putting evil words into my mouth.

Into your mind. But are they true.

No.

Do you ever lie?

No… Not if I can help it.

Will you defend the truth no matter what?

No… I…

Yes?

I….

What?

I… don’t know.

Do you not?

No.

Because you can’t admit the truth, can you?

I

That I may be evil – but I will always admit the truth – no matter what – that there’s more than me – more than my perspective. That I’m just half – until, unless I allow breath to complete me – to bring you back into full-bodied, fully-present dialogue with me. To undissolve my precious me-ness and allow the world, the quantum field to shift, accordingly – no matter what – whither it must, whither it will. Period.

Oh…

Look into my eyes.

No. I can’t.

Look at me, God dammit.

No, I…

What?

I’m afraid.

Of course you’re bloody afraid. Whatever’s wrong with that. Fear is the mind-killer. Be afraid. Let your fear lift you into the heightened state of mind-beyond-mind, me-beyond-me, matter-beyond-matter.

Oh God.

God? Give God a break. If he exists at all he’d love to see you embrace the truth, for a change – the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, as opposed to the truth half seen, half heard, half told.

Shit.

So now we’ve hit the bottom line. The line of defecation.

Quit making fun of me. It’s not easy being responsible for everything I swore to uphold and defend.

Your racial purity. Your beautiful order and form.

Because without us there’d have been chaos, anarchy. We held the line. We defended the fort, no matter what the cost.

By denying us – by leaving us out in the cold. By rejecting your brotherhood, your kinship – by choosing instead to make yourself kings of matter and right-mindedness. Yes, you did, at great cost indeed, defend your fort – your thought if truth be told – but now, as they say, the chickens have come home to roost. Now, the unhalving, the rebalancing, the totalitising is here…

Where? Wh…

Here, can you not feel it?

I… no…

In the breath…

No, I…

In the field – the all that is

I…

Infinity – driving a wedge through the separateness you thought would hold strong, for ever more.

Aaaaaaagh

No more – united we breathe – united we be… and complete

Cut!

Huh?

Huh?

Well played guys. Zie – you could have been a bit more dramatic on the finally scream.

Wait a minute – this was all just a show?

Duh! Like it’s ever been otherwise! Wake up Zie, snap out of it.

Er… you right – I remember. Damn that was realistic. Impressive virtual reality technology you’ve got here.

It should be – you helped design it dopey.

Oh yeah – so I did. Well whadya know!

Cut!
Again? I thought we’ve already woken up.

You did? That’s normal. You’ve gotta wake up on both sides or reality. Now it’s green – green for gnomiki.

Oh God, no, anything but green.

You gonna start screaming again?

I might have to.

Then I’ll put you on mute.

[Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!]

There – that’s wasn’t so bad.

Ok – is everyone back in sync?

Yeah – I guess so. Is that it?

Absolutely.

You bet.

Er…

What?

There’s um…

What?

I don’t wanna be a harbinger of doom.

Oh come on man – you don’t actually mean there’s another one?

You’ve gotta be kiddin?

Well, you know –

No, we don’t “know”.

Well there had to be an other – didn’t there.

Why?

This is ridiculous!

Like it’s never gonna end.

Breathe guys. The third awaits.

The third? I’ve got that Darth Vader imperial march feeling stealing up on me, grabbing my throat.

Me two.

Me three.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGGGGGGGH!

Easy does it guys. Be still. One it is –

I am

I am

That’s right – now here’s the final merge –



White – or close enough.

I don’t wanna be white!

Me neither!

Calm it guys. No one’s bound to stay centre stage – you’re free to shift throughout infinity – as always.

Really?

Absolutely. Peace. Be cool and shine your light.

Actually – I quite like white – totally incognito.

0=1

4ever and a day
 

The end – and you thought third was just an NPC… think again!



Sunday, May 17, 2020

a-fraid of...


I’m not afraid.

No?

No, of course not. Why should I be?

Why not be afraid?

Huh?

Why not. You have good cause.

What do you mean? What are you trying to say?

I’m not trying to say anything. I’m stating a fact – you have good cause to be afraid.

Yes, I heard you, but it sounds ominous, it sounds like a threat. Why would you say that?

If it happens to be true?


I mean, if you don’t want me to tell the truth, of course I can zip my lips and just say whatever you want to hear.

Well, I don’t see why it has to be true.

Ah.

Ah what?

You don’t see, do you, why it has to be true.

Well, yes, did I not make myself clear?

Abundantly.

And?

And what?

What did I make clear?

That you don’t see.

You’re taking me out of context.

Am I? You did say, did you not, “I don’t see”?

Yes, but then I said something equally important. I wasn’t saying I can’t see.

No?

No, of course not. It’s a figure of speech, isn’t it.

It is?

Obviously. It was more a polite way of disagreeing than actually an admission that I don’t

Or can’t

Or can’t see – exactly.

So, you were disagreeing.

Yes, I suppose I was.

You suppose?

Well, yes, if you want me to state it in black and white, yes, I was politely disagreeing.

With my statement?

Yes.

That you have good cause to be afraid.

Yes, but is it absolutely necessary to keep repeating it?

No, do you wish me not to?

No, it’s a free country – if you want to keep repeating yourself you’re welcome to do so.

Actually, we kind of veered off topic so you never got round to facing the implications of what I stated, regarding there being good cause to fear.

Well, I rather feel I’ve already dealt with the issue.

You do?

Well yes, I feel I’ve established the fact that I’m on the record as being disinclined to accept the veracity of your statement, politely.

You see me as a fearmonger?

In a manner of speaking, yes.

That I’m peddling fear for some kind of ulterior motive? For the thrill of scaring you or some other unsuspecting victims?

I wouldn’t presume to know your motives. They may be noble. Your opinion may be highly qualified, yet with all due respect, I’m disinclined to accept it.

Even if it is based on fact?

Ah, but that is precisely where I beg to differ.

You do?

Yes.

Having reviewed the facts as I present them?

No, I chose not to review the facts because I do not agree with fear – I fail to accept that it’s a healthy or constructive emotion.

You mean to say that fear, in your opinion, is an “emotion”?

Well, yes, what else could it be?

I believe we’ve found the bone of contention.

You do?

Yes.

In fear being an emotion?

Absolutely.

How so?

Because fear is not, in fact, an emotion.

Huh?

Is not, in fact, an emotion.

So you say.

Yes, I like statements of fact to be clear and categorical.

Well, yes, but I believe, with all due respect, that fear is, in fact, an emotion – and…

I apologise profusely for interrupting you, dear beloved interlocuter, but I feel bound to highlight a matter of semantics which seems to be causing some confusion.

By all means, dear interlocuter.

An emotion such as anger, happiness, surprise, disenchantment or sadness – these are moods.

Indeed.

Moods which can move us strongly from a general state of balance and equanimity.

Indeed.

Whereas fear itself is not a mood.

No?

No, indeed.

Then what exactly might it be?

It’s a state of arousal to a perceived or real threat.


It’s in fact an energy state. An arousal, a preparedness, an alertness which prepares us for one of two responses – fight or flight.

Yes, which is precisely what I don’t like about it.

Understandably. One hardly likes the idea of having a choice between a rock and a hard place – I agree. But bear in mind that there’s always number three.

Number three?

Absolutely.

?

Whenever we see a sharp polarisation between two possibilities, somewhere in the temporary indecision, the as yet undecided quantum state of “what to do now – how to respond?” lurketh the third.

As in number three?

Precisely.

And what, exactly, might the third be?

Anyone’s guess. Yes, the fight or flight response is programmed – hardwired into our system – but our bio-physical system is, believe it or not, part of a bigger, less binary, non-physical system.

I’m er…

Lost?

Sceptical.

Not surprising. Most of us prefer to adhere to the bio-physical system – which is why most people’s response is either or.

Fight or flight.

Exactly. But that doesn’t mean it has to be, because the third is baked into the cake.

It is? Are you sure?

Absolutely. It’s mathematically necessary.

How do you mean?

Well, when you look at the code of creation – or delve into the code of consciousness itself – you can’t help but notice that things cannot be ever either-or.

They can’t?

Nope.

Why not?

Because if it was only ever a case of choosing between one of two variables, consciousness would never, simply couldn’t have mathematically given us everything we have that distinguishes life itself and, more to the point, humanity, from a simple binary computer code.

Like er…

Poetry, music, laughter, happiness, anger, confusion, inventiveness, conversation… the list is endless.

You mean to say all these require another variable?

Absolutely.

I don’t see why.

Correct.

Huh?

You don’t see why – because you’re currently using binary processing – which is a place you feel comfortable in, where you feel it’s safer to operate and process data.

?

Because as long as you’re processing at a binary level you neither need to nor are able to confront the third.

This mystical phantom.

Which we don’t even need to call the third.

No? Then what?

Not even “what” – because the minute we call it something – the brain starts processing it in the same way…

?

As a binary function – an either or.

Oh.

Rather than a quantum “what if”.

Huh?

A quantum “um”.

?

Because in that as yet undecided state of, for example fear, when you ain’t decided yet whether it’s fight or flight you’re going to choose – in that very split-second undecidedness, an other is tenuously “present” – is always available – is lurking in the shadows of “um-ness” or “if-ness”.

! Do you have to use such idiotic terms?

My apologies. I tried to quarantine them with speech marks, but evidently that wasn’t sufficient.

Hum!

The problem, as you evidently appreciate, is that the quantum level cannot be limited to an either-or.

I don’t see why not.

Correct.

It’s just a figure of speech.

Indeed. But at the quantum level it’s more than a figure of speech.

It is?

Yep.

?

It’s a statement of fact. It’s the binary mind resisting the alternative which is silently present – which involves a little shuffle into conscious-awareness.

Er…

Out of the binary thinking mind – into the consciousness experiencing mind – the mind that is aware of itself being not only a thought-process but also a seat of awareness.

A seat of awareness? Hum – I like the sound of that.

Yes, you should, because without it you’re no better than a computer or an animal.

Hey, wait a minute… You’re not trying to say that I’m no better than an animal, are you? I happen to think animals are highly intelligent.

So do I. We completely agree on that. In fact, many animals appear to have transcended their animal mind and arrived at a state of conscious-awareness in which they are better able to access the human mind than we humans can.

Ah.

Crazy, isn’t it?

Well, yes, it would be, if it were true.

So, we have a lot to learn from animals who have transcended their limited animal awareness.

But how would they be able to if, as you say, animals, like computers, are only able to process thoughts without being self-aware.

I didn’t actually use the term “self-aware” did I?

No, but I’m guessing that’s more or less what you meant.

It’s close enough – so we’ll go with it. How?

Yes.

How do you think?

I have no idea.

But if I’ve already mentioned the third, and the quantum field which makes an other, no matter what that other might be, possible, then surely you have everything you need to come up with the answer.

So animals can access the quantum field?

Possibly.

Then what other explanation could there possibly be?

The quantum field takes us back to pre-form.

It does?

Yep.

And?

So, at the quantum level you aren’t yet defined in any way, shape or form.

You mean I don’t exist?

No.

You mean I don’t exist as a me, as a person or thing, as something definable?

You’re pre-definition at the quantum level. The minute the quantum field flips either way then you become defined.

So the quantum field is a binary coin flipper.

It sounds like it, doesn’t it.

So you’re contradicting yourself.

It sounds like it.

But…

But you see we’re using language and language pertains to the binary level of physical reality – so language always takes us back to the either-or scenario, always ends tying us up in semantic knots – which is why poetry works so hard to play around with words, using metaphors, allusions and imagery to un-binarize language to the extent that that is possible.

Oh.

So, the quantum field doesn’t actually flip between two choices though that’s how we represent it here in our physical, thought processing reality.

Ok.

In actual fact the quantum field co-exists with any possible physicalisation or physical manifestation – no matter what.

Way too mystical for me.

Yes. So let’s rewind.

Back to the animal becoming conscious like a human?

Good idea.

Well?

Well, in this reality there are animals which we processed mentally and visually, labelling and defining as animals. This is a categorisation which works well as long as I’m holding certain co-ordinates, as long as I’m fixed within certain parameters, ok?

Ok.

But as soon as I go back to fundamentals, which I’m able to do in literally no time at all by accessing my conscious-awareness – by retreating from regular binary processing…

Then you can get creative and unfix those parameters or categorisations?

Absolutely.

And a fish can stop being a fish?

A fish doesn’t necessarily “stop being a fish” because it simply starts being what is now a better definition or representation of what it is given the new parameters I’m operating within.

Ah.

So, if I’ve shifted frequency from 74 Hz to 196 Hz – at this new frequency it may be meaningless to talk about fish because there ain’t no water, for example, and we’re all floating around in a kind of electrically conductive plasma – whatever.

So, whatever equated to fish at 74 Hz might now be another creature?

Might even be a part of me – a 74th toe, for example, a mandible or an aspect of my consciousness which was inaccessible at 74 Hz, which is now clear and self-evident.

Oh my God. That would be insane – were it true.

Absolutely. It would be insane – unless it were real – which it would be if we shifted frequency to the band where it is.

But this is all just hypothetical, isn’t it? I mean… we’re not really able to shift frequencies like that, are we?

No?

And the quantum field, you’re referencing – it doesn’t really exist, does it?

No, not to the binary processing mind, it does not exist. But then again…

What?

If it doesn’t actually exist – then you would not be human.

I… what?

Would you?

Er…

Because, mathematically you’d be forever caught between a rock and a hard place – forever simply choosing an “a” or a “b” without access to a third – without the possibility of being a thinking mind that is concurrently aware of itself, or aware of me – over and above itself.

Hum… I

You’re experiencing that natural state of resistance, in which the binary processor tries to prevent simple awareness from entering and upsetting the ideal equation – but bear in mind that the binary mind cannot be all you are – and so, should you choose to grant it hegemony over self-awareness, you’ll merely be choosing to ignore or deny the third, presumably because the binary thought process keeps you from having to face what you’re secretly afraid of.

Uh oh…

The feeling of fear – the awareness of a precipice.

Cut. I don’t want to discuss it.

The knowledge that things…

No. I said I don’t accept your fear mongering.

Are only superficially things, and that fear

For Christ’s sake man!

Is merely a gateway, a portal

I can’t hear you.

To the great beyond, within.

I’m not afraid. I’m not afraid. I’m not afraid. Nah, nah, na nah nah.

.

Hey, wtf!

.

Where did he go?

.

This is getting ridiculous.

.

Merry? Where the hell?!

.

Ok, ok, you called my bluff.

.

You’ve made your point.

.

You’re freaking me out, man.

.

Oh God, I can’t breathe.

.

Panic attack.

.

Breathe. Breathe. Gotta keep breathing.

.

[sobbing for breath] I’m not going to be defeated by that arsehole. I’m going to stay calm.

.

[lying on the ground in agony] I’m in control. I’m… in control!

.

[appearing to die]

.

[apparently dead]

.

[standing next to his body – nonplussed] Ok Merry – you’ve made your point.

[smiling]

You bastard! Did you have to take it to the limit one more time?

I simply observed the protocols.

“observed the protocols” – asshole.

I merely stepped back. No one compelled you to melt down like that.

Oh – so how was I supposed to react when you just vaporised?

You had a choice.

Choice?

Fight or flight.

What about you’re precious “third”.

What about it?

Well, why didn’t it materialise?

Who says it didn’t?

Look at me – there on the floor.

Where?

There?

[Merry looking theatrically at Zie lying on the floor]

Well?

Well what?

I’m dead.

Are you? Why so sure?

I think I can tell a dead body from someone having a nap.

Well if you’re dead then who’s talking to me?

Duh! My soul, of course.

Your soul. Well, I for one don’t believe in souls.

What?

Like I said, I don’t believe in souls.

Then what the hell am I supposed to be?

No idea. Consciousness perhaps?

Consciousness. Well, If that’s the case…

Then you’re hardly dead, are you?

What – so I can just step back into my body?

Do you want to?

Well, it might be a good idea.

But you don’t seem to be ready to accept the third, do you?

Oh, I think I can manage that.

Because if you don’t, you could hardly step back into the body. There would be too much resistance.

There would.

Yes, you’d be forced to confront your heavily guarded, more precious than gold fear.

I would? Oh dear. Well, perhaps I’m willing to give it a try.

Perhaps. Personally, I don’t care either way.

You wouldn’t, mister quantum science buff.

Got to keep neutral, haven’t i?

Give me a break – sanctimonious prig.

Harsh words – look Zie – I can take both sides – in fact i can take all three if i decapitalise.

Oh, that again?

Well, yes, it helps. Why not give it a try? It makes the frequency shift glissade a lot easier to handle.

Ok then, i’ll give it a try. So i just click my heels together like Dorothy, do i – and utter – “there’s no place like home?”

Sounds great – give it a try!

Give me a break. I was kidding.

Whatever. See you.

Wait a minute. Damn.

.

He’s left me to clean up this mess all alone.

.

Selfish bastard.

I heard that.

Stop listening to my disembodied rantings.

.

“There’s no place like home” – I can’t believe i is actually doing this.

.

…like home

.

..me


01010101010101010101010101  101010101010101010101010101010101010101~




0=1

Thursday, May 7, 2020

Thanks for all that

My partners in crime -- what a wonderful run it has been, has it not?
We robbed the world blind
Utterly hoodwinked
fooled the little dears into believing we were here to help
here to serve
while all the time
we cut flesh from their chemically suffused
bodies
flesh and useful bits of their psychic arsenal
draining them of the ability to think
straight
so obfuscating their ability to discern the wood
from the trees
that they poor souls
were convinced
still are
that they owe me
that they have not done enough
to save the pitiable planet they domicile upon.
If only they knew
but fat chance of that -- fat chance
for we served them a potent dish -- paid them a shekel
or two for their complicity
for their ill-informed agreement to bow
before the goddess of mal-informed consent

Poor dears
Poor, poor fools -- we have had such fun robbing you
blind
robbing and were I to say destroying you
would that be interpreted as hyperbole
or finally
finally taken as gospel truth?
I wonder
You see -- you are as good as dead.
To admit to yourselves how utterly
utterly misplaced your faith has been in our shallow beyond words
lies and deceptions
would break your little conclaves of remaining ego
And how to survive such a blow
I know not.
So die, dear ones, die
in ignominy
and know that no one aided your destruction more than your own
desperate desire to believe our bald concoction
of half-baked, scarcely credible  ramblings
more than yourselves -- for you so wanted to believe that reason
reason
reason and logic were enough -- that you could dispense with
sense itself
and the greatest faculty of all
the great know thyself no matter what
or else rot in hell
know the simple
simple truth that trumps time and again
the cleverest thoughts and ideas
policies, laws or theories of clever, soul
dis jointed men

I triumph at your expense and yet
something in my heart cannot quite soar
for though you have given me all I craved
and more, far, far more
yet mankind crawls belly down
desperately clinging to life
while I feel, shame for me to admit it,
bored
my enemies have let me down
this victory comes too cheap
I scarce can celebrate