You mean to say that ridiculous blog post about atoms was your work Merry?
No I don’t.
Well that’s
a relief – it nearly killed me. I was beginning to think you’d lost your touch.
Can I ask
you Zie, why you bothered to read it if it nearly killed you?
Oh – you
know – a sense of duty.
Sense of
duty? Are you serious?
Well, I
thought there might be something important in it.
Did you now?
Yes. Turns
out I was wrong.
Oh right –
nothing of any interest?
Not really –
nothing I could use in my daily existence.
What about
this?
Hey! Hey
Merry – what are you doing?
Nothing
much.
Nothing much
– I don’t call that nothing much. In fact, I call that pretty substantial. I
felt like I was falling into a void.
Be sure to
avoid the void.
I hardly see
this as a joking matter. I happen to have a rather sensitive stomach, and
violent movements down into a yawning pit of darkness are the last thing I need.
Oh, but
think about the science.
What
science?
Well
presumably you’d like to know how I did it.
Well – the
thing is Merry – you can do these things – you’re exceptional. You’re not
really human, are you?
You mean you think I’m alien?
Or faery –
I don’t know – but you’re way too confident at stepping outside 3D reality and
working with other dimensions to be a regular guy.
I'm not sure whether to be flattered or offended Zie, but
nothing’s stopping you or the rest of humanity doing likewise.
But we’re
human, Merry.
Well, what’s
that got to do with it?
Humans don’t
do that kind of thing.
Didn’t, until
now, but I think you’ll find that this is about to change.
What?... Why?
Or how?
James has public-domained the new atomic definitions. It’s like a new contract
– a new covenant if you like.
But no one’s
going to read that thing – it almost killed me, and I’m a sucker for punishment.
No one needs
to – it’s in the public domain, which means it’s as good as read.
It is?
Absolutely!
Don’t you
start saying that…
What?
“Absolutely”... It felt like I was being brainwashed reading that article. He uses that word incessantly.
You’re
absolutely right – you were.
Damn – I
hate being brain washed.
Who wouldn’t
– but this was a different kind of exercise.
In what way?
It was surreptitiously enabling you to quit the quagmire of general relativism – should you
intend – and reconnect with your absolute.
Oh. And
where’s my absolute?
Or what?
Well,
whatever.
Because you’ll never find your absolute anywhere in 3D space or time.
No?
No – that’s
general relativity – which is an artificial construct – where things are things, where you are you, and never the twain, apparently, shall meet.
Oh. So where should I look?
Within. You are absolute, as Septimus explained so eloquently yesterday…
Septimus –
is that his name?
oh really
Zie – I hardly know – but Septimus will do for the moment, unless you’d prefer it to be Darrimus or Jelly?
Ok, ok – I
get the message. But what exactly did he explain. It all seemed so vague
and abstract. Why on earth couldn’t he leave well enough alone? Why the
infernal need to tinker with definitions? We all know what the atom is, don’t
we? We hardly need a new set of definitions further complicating things.
Ah – but you
see – here in 3D things are purported to be merely things – which is exactly
what they are in general relativity, but the minute you need to re-wire the absolute – and reconnect with that which simply truly is – then you
require a different approach.
You do? Why?
Because for
a thing to be, for a thing to exist – it obviously requires validation, does
it not, mathematically? We need to be sure that the numbers add up.
If you say
so. But can't we just get a bunch of people to observe it, a chair for example, and decide whether or not it's really a chair?
Absolutely. That's the tried and tested empirical approach, but with time, things get more complicated as your reality advances towards completion, especially when you're approaching the limits of perception at the sub-atomic or quantum level. That's when you begin to realise that the mere act of observing seems to affect what you're seeing, which raises some important questions.
It does?
Yeah, like what the hell's going on? Things ought to exist independently of my observation, yet apparently not. So what if perception itself, or consciousness, is an integral part of the equation. What if, in fact, we're affecting everything in a minute yet statistically significant way, merely by streaming it through our quantum field...
of consciousness? Sounds insane.
Yep, but try as you might to ignore this conundrum, as 3D reality matures and becomes increasingly aware of the universe both vast and nanoscopic, without any leaning towards mysticism, we are compelled to probe the final-frontier, to ascertain what actually is certain, what actually is real...
You’re referring to conscious-awareness?
Yes. We begin to realise that we can take nothing for granted. Everything in 3D reality is ever so slightly tainted by the quantum tar brush, and thus, suspect.
So what was taken for granted not long ago is now no longer a given.
Yes. Suddenly, as 3D reality enters its final stage preparing for inter-stellar inter-dimensionality, it reaches a crisis of confidence, which can induce a bewildering sense of vertigo as the full extent of relativity lacking any absolutes suddenly makes itself known.
But most people seem to be doing fine, Merry.
Absolutely. That's the tried and tested empirical approach, but with time, things get more complicated as your reality advances towards completion, especially when you're approaching the limits of perception at the sub-atomic or quantum level. That's when you begin to realise that the mere act of observing seems to affect what you're seeing, which raises some important questions.
It does?
Yeah, like what the hell's going on? Things ought to exist independently of my observation, yet apparently not. So what if perception itself, or consciousness, is an integral part of the equation. What if, in fact, we're affecting everything in a minute yet statistically significant way, merely by streaming it through our quantum field...
of consciousness? Sounds insane.
Yep, but try as you might to ignore this conundrum, as 3D reality matures and becomes increasingly aware of the universe both vast and nanoscopic, without any leaning towards mysticism, we are compelled to probe the final-frontier, to ascertain what actually is certain, what actually is real...
You’re referring to conscious-awareness?
Yes. We begin to realise that we can take nothing for granted. Everything in 3D reality is ever so slightly tainted by the quantum tar brush, and thus, suspect.
So what was taken for granted not long ago is now no longer a given.
Yes. Suddenly, as 3D reality enters its final stage preparing for inter-stellar inter-dimensionality, it reaches a crisis of confidence, which can induce a bewildering sense of vertigo as the full extent of relativity lacking any absolutes suddenly makes itself known.
But most people seem to be doing fine, Merry.
The calm before the storm. Believe me Zie, your scientists have been head-sanding this growing awareness of impending doom for fifty years or more, hoping it'll go away... hail Mary praying for a miracle, but doing so, though natural and indeed predictable, they are front loading the conscious-awareness with quantum charge, so to speak, which in itself is going to trigger a massive event. The platform grows critically unstable, bizarre though this seems.
So what can we do?
Nothing.
Nothing?
Wait and see.
Wait and see? Why are you telling me this if i can't do anything? Why rob me of blissful ignorance?
Why? Because you're the outlier and i am the perfect storm.
Oh God... I don't wanna hear this doom 'n gloom.
Listen Zie, you can do nothing because this is a natural process, an awareness shift which always happens when human consciousness goes from the what-is-what 3D reality containment to the next level.
You're sounding so 2012 Merry. It's been and passed. The end of the world didn't in fact happen.
You see, so now we're in an age of complacency. We were expecting the stock market to crash, so to speak, it never materialised so we're smugly confident that the worst is past.
Damn, why do you have to Cassandrasise my reality?
Why do you assume I'm a factor in this equation? At best I'm a messenger, but more likely I'm an indication of the impossible load you collectively are now putting on the system.
What system?... D'you mean the financial system?
Ha! That's just a tiny part of the greater whole.
Well, can't you be more specific?
Try material reality for starters. Your definitions are now hopelessly outdated. This is a major issue. The system is teetering, a crash is inevitable.
Well I for one don't believe it.
And you're in good company. Keep dancing while the music lasts, but some of you are making preparations, have sold their overpriced treasuries n'stocks and started to get down to the fascinating nitty gritty, learning to ascertain what, in fact, is what.
But how?
Atomically. We have to get back to basics.
Isn't that what the people at CERN are doing, using their particle accelerator to find the Higgs Boson, or whatever it is they're looking for?
No. They're fiddling with straws as Vesuvius smokes. When it's time to get back to basics, when you really need to get real, the last thing you want is high energy beams, high complexity speculations. Nothing could be more absurd.
Then what?
You need to feel the ground under your feet, the fundament, so to speak, you need to get back down to zero, if such a thing exists, but this has to be done individually, personally. Each person has to reconnect the dots.
Er... which dots do you mean. I thought you said the fundament is a zero...
It doesn't matter what i said or what i say. This is not rocket science.
You could have fooled me.
This is basic awareness, rediscovering the atom, rediscovering what actually is immutably, above and beyond 3D's general relativity.
But...
Yes, the fundament's below. Don't you see Zie? Above below – it's all one.
One...? Not zero?
Zero... one... These are just labels, just terms. Connecting with the atomic centre, which for the sake of argument I'm calling the fundament, or the atomic overarching whole...
You mean the universe?
Which we can call the firmament, and consider the universe, and you're well on your way to validating things mathematically, and finding your elusive atom.
But how can i do this? The atom you're describing is either impossibly big or small.
"Atom" – if the term bothers you, replace it with "chair". The only thing you can't do is take it for granted and assume it's there. You have to find it, validate it, prove it fundamentally. It needs to be confirmed from the top down, from the bottom up, and from inside out.
What about
from outside in?
Yes – but
that’s the initial observation itself, the act of seeing is believing – which then needs to be confirmed from inside out.
I’m a bit
lost Merry – can you explain?
Of course. Any
thing has to be held in place from three different angles at a minimum. From above looking down our atom
or chair
is close enough to zero, an infinitesimal part of the greater whole – to be considered a point; then conversely it needs to be one, whole in itself – a chair, and not merely a jumble of atoms, so you need to validate its chairness no less from the bottom up; and finally – because all this is only verifiably meaningful if I observe it myself – it also has to be, no less, an expression of the third – neither zero nor one...
Then what?
Can't you guess?
Er... not really.
What could the third possibly be?
I don't kn... No!
Yes.
Not the equals sign?
The very same!
Zero equals one! 0=1 So... I be that which equals zero and one, above and below, making the two is – simply by being – me.
Yes, well done.
or chair
is close enough to zero, an infinitesimal part of the greater whole – to be considered a point; then conversely it needs to be one, whole in itself – a chair, and not merely a jumble of atoms, so you need to validate its chairness no less from the bottom up; and finally – because all this is only verifiably meaningful if I observe it myself – it also has to be, no less, an expression of the third – neither zero nor one...
Then what?
Can't you guess?
Er... not really.
What could the third possibly be?
I don't kn... No!
Yes.
Not the equals sign?
The very same!
Zero equals one! 0=1 So... I be that which equals zero and one, above and below, making the two is – simply by being – me.
Yes, well done.
You mean
there has to be a direct, a fundamental relationship between the chair, myself and the entire
universe?
Yes.
Insane!
Well, things
were never really going to be merely things – once you started to look at them
mathematically – and ask a few basic
questions…
Such as?
Where they
come from originally – or their energy comes from?
Well it just
exists, doesn’t it, like everything else. We’re living in a vast ocean of
energy – which has been here since big bang.
Yes, that’s
the 3D definition – but it’s not going to take you very far.
Why not?
Because it’s
only true if you ignore consciousness, if you exclude infinity, if you deny
that which simply is is.
Deny “that
which simply is”?? What on earth’s that meant to mean.
It means
that living in a 3D universe of things you have to hold and hide a huge blind
spot – a huge void – which conveniently no one notices until it gets too big –
and then becomes unstable.
You're talking about that void I almost fell into just now, aren't you?
Absolutely.
Don’t!
Please don’t use that word – it’s making me feel queasy after what Severus –
Septimus
- Septimus
said yesterday.
Sorry Zie –
I can’t avoid this. The absolute is the scorpion’s tale which sooner or
later comes back to sting us in the butt. Until that time you can insist to
the whole world that you have no butt whatsoever, and as they’re all playing
the very same game – you’re all able to agree on this one point. Your butts are
about to reveal the fallacy of the flat reality you’re living in.
Flat reality
– you mean like flat earth?
I mean like
I say. Sitting on it doesn't mean it ain't there. If you’ve ignored or avoided the void, you’ve more or less excluded
torsion, spin, depth and a load of other factors, all of which come into play
when you’re working with the totality.
So you mean
we’re all in for a major dose of vertigo or sea sickness?
I mean, that
which simply is can be excluded for only so long – until the chick is ready to
hatch.
Oh – so now it's a chick, is it?
Yes, the
image is satisfactory as far as metaphors go. What you call yourself, what you
think you are and what you really are – I shall not even try to say – because
words never quite hit the mark – or if they do, the totality – as opposed to
what you call “reality” has already moved on – so you’d be forever playing
catch up, forever chasing your tail, living in the past.
Oh.
So, instead
of whatting, instead of trying to define or explain what something is – we go
to the atomic approach – in which we recognise that whatever it is – it’s the
totality which is never going to be what it seems, or only as long as you're good-boy viewing it from within the 3D space-time politically-correct, smoothed and homogenised viewing platform. Outside your arbitrary and artificial 3Dolatry, things are no longer seemable, nor even strictly speaking, things.
Holy cow. Are you serious?
Actually, I try to avoid needless incursions into seriousness, but that doesn't alter the science of what is what. Take, for example, your base unit of thing – the atom – in the 3D scheme of things the atom is about as small as it gets, right down at the event horizon of things, at the edge of matter, beyond which you're in a quantum realm of uncertainty, and why?
Because sub-atomic particles are inherently unstable?
No, remember what i said – 3D reality is essentially arbitrary and artificial. It's like you chose a big empty field and placed marker stakes around you to provide reference points. To the very same extent that your universe is "big" your atom is "small", no more, no less.
Oh.
Indeed. Beyond their respective bigness and smallness things get fuzzy, things get funny, and why?
Because things are essentially fuzzy-funny?
Yep. They only seem certain, stable and thingful within the reference frame that is 3D "reality", which you yourself wittingly or unwittingly set up.
But how can this be?
Long story, clever stuff, involving filters and mental blocks. Don't wanna go into it now. Just let's focus on the fact that this ain't a prison – far from it – it's a rather sophisticated reality platform, in which you get to experience things as-are.
As are?
As if they really are, which indeed they are, down here in 3Dom, in the platform-cum-operating system.
Oh.
Yep. Pretty nifty, until you run into system limits. At that point you need to rearrange things, or rather, redefine your relationship to things, starting with the ubiquitous atom, which is where we are at, now.
Oh.
Yep. So here goes...
Wait – you're not going to just redefine the atom as if there's nothing to it, nothing further to consider, here 'n now?
Er, spot on. I like the pun "nothing to it"... intentional?
No, it wasn't.
Never mind, so here goes...
But, i quite like the old familiar atom. I'm not sure i want it redefined.
I'm not surprised, but there's nothing i can do. You guys have triggered certain events, which brings me into play.
What events?
Oh, various things such as um... let me see, splitting the atom, in violation of universal law.
But that happened ages ago.
Yes, a bit embarrassing. Bureaucratic snafu!
Bureaucratic...
snafu! Good word that. Anyways, here i am, so let's get on with it. Now, where were we?
Redefining the atom, I think you said.
Oh yes. Ok, let me take away the marker posts for a moment.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaarg
Try to relax, this won't take long... 1. the atom is neither big nor small. 2. it is i am is it not 3. whatever. Done
Uh? What's with the chair? It's...
Behaving atomically, as a unit of tharg.
Of what?
Any thing, any singularity which happens to hold the materiality, the harmonic of your very own being, 0=1.
My being?
Yep.
You mean I'm at the centre.
Nope. It means you, mathematically, are the centre.
Between the atom and...
the universe, or what we might call atomic alpha and atomic omega, bearing in mind size is just a matter of perception or configuration within 3D.
Oh.
Actually, there's one more thing.
Ok. Fire ahead.
You.
Me?
Yes, you're the being that holds everything in place.
Me personally?
Yes, you personally Zie, and every other iteration of you personally. Approximately 7 billion at the moment.
Phew, i was beginning to feel a little too important.
But there's more to it... you're also atom.
I'm an atom?
Yes, but not exactly.
Er...
Strictly speaking you're not an atom... You're atom. It's a small but significant distinction which I don't wish to dwell on right now. We can come back to it later.
Um...
There are three of you, alpha, omega and zie, or zed, if you prefer British English.
But that's my name.
Pure coincidence, i assure you.
So what does it mean?
It means that you are both being and thing, both particle and wave, and because atomic alpha and omega are your encapsulators, your limit, the harmonic boundaries of what you thinging be, they too fluctuate between thinging and being, or the particle-wave dichotomy as we sometimes call it.
Holy cow. Are you serious?
Actually, I try to avoid needless incursions into seriousness, but that doesn't alter the science of what is what. Take, for example, your base unit of thing – the atom – in the 3D scheme of things the atom is about as small as it gets, right down at the event horizon of things, at the edge of matter, beyond which you're in a quantum realm of uncertainty, and why?
Because sub-atomic particles are inherently unstable?
No, remember what i said – 3D reality is essentially arbitrary and artificial. It's like you chose a big empty field and placed marker stakes around you to provide reference points. To the very same extent that your universe is "big" your atom is "small", no more, no less.
Oh.
Indeed. Beyond their respective bigness and smallness things get fuzzy, things get funny, and why?
Because things are essentially fuzzy-funny?
Yep. They only seem certain, stable and thingful within the reference frame that is 3D "reality", which you yourself wittingly or unwittingly set up.
But how can this be?
Long story, clever stuff, involving filters and mental blocks. Don't wanna go into it now. Just let's focus on the fact that this ain't a prison – far from it – it's a rather sophisticated reality platform, in which you get to experience things as-are.
As are?
As if they really are, which indeed they are, down here in 3Dom, in the platform-cum-operating system.
Oh.
Yep. Pretty nifty, until you run into system limits. At that point you need to rearrange things, or rather, redefine your relationship to things, starting with the ubiquitous atom, which is where we are at, now.
Oh.
Yep. So here goes...
Wait – you're not going to just redefine the atom as if there's nothing to it, nothing further to consider, here 'n now?
Er, spot on. I like the pun "nothing to it"... intentional?
No, it wasn't.
Never mind, so here goes...
But, i quite like the old familiar atom. I'm not sure i want it redefined.
I'm not surprised, but there's nothing i can do. You guys have triggered certain events, which brings me into play.
What events?
Oh, various things such as um... let me see, splitting the atom, in violation of universal law.
But that happened ages ago.
Yes, a bit embarrassing. Bureaucratic snafu!
Bureaucratic...
snafu! Good word that. Anyways, here i am, so let's get on with it. Now, where were we?
Redefining the atom, I think you said.
Oh yes. Ok, let me take away the marker posts for a moment.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaarg
Try to relax, this won't take long... 1. the atom is neither big nor small. 2. it is i am is it not 3. whatever. Done
Uh? What's with the chair? It's...
Behaving atomically, as a unit of tharg.
Of what?
Any thing, any singularity which happens to hold the materiality, the harmonic of your very own being, 0=1.
My being?
Yep.
You mean I'm at the centre.
Nope. It means you, mathematically, are the centre.
Between the atom and...
the universe, or what we might call atomic alpha and atomic omega, bearing in mind size is just a matter of perception or configuration within 3D.
Oh.
Actually, there's one more thing.
Ok. Fire ahead.
You.
Me?
Yes, you're the being that holds everything in place.
Me personally?
Yes, you personally Zie, and every other iteration of you personally. Approximately 7 billion at the moment.
Phew, i was beginning to feel a little too important.
But there's more to it... you're also atom.
I'm an atom?
Yes, but not exactly.
Er...
Strictly speaking you're not an atom... You're atom. It's a small but significant distinction which I don't wish to dwell on right now. We can come back to it later.
Um...
There are three of you, alpha, omega and zie, or zed, if you prefer British English.
But that's my name.
Pure coincidence, i assure you.
So what does it mean?
It means that you are both being and thing, both particle and wave, and because atomic alpha and omega are your encapsulators, your limit, the harmonic boundaries of what you thinging be, they too fluctuate between thinging and being, or the particle-wave dichotomy as we sometimes call it.
Oh.
Once we allow
the atom to be wave as well as particle, or is
no less than thing, once we accept and recognise you can’t have atoms at
one scale horizon without having them at the other
You mean vastly small and vastly big?
Yes, but also you, the missing link, are neither bigger nor smaller than the other two, for we are now dealing with absolutes, and one is one, no matter what.
Oh God.
And your atom is an all embracing system of singularity, or singularisation, in spite of the bewildering manyness and much of things. Your atom becomes the unifying principle, the axis mundi. It comes as close as physically possible to God himself, without actually stepping on his toes and tweaking his nose.
Oh God.
And your atom is an all embracing system of singularity, or singularisation, in spite of the bewildering manyness and much of things. Your atom becomes the unifying principle, the axis mundi. It comes as close as physically possible to God himself, without actually stepping on his toes and tweaking his nose.
Well,
frankly I find this hard to believe.
Naturally.
If we succeeded in splitting the atom, as apparently we did, then the atom should be yesterday's story, yesterday's absolute. I personally think you're wrong to make it your absolute or th...
Naturally.
If we succeeded in splitting the atom, as apparently we did, then the atom should be yesterday's story, yesterday's absolute. I personally think you're wrong to make it your absolute or th...
Tharg. Why so?
Because you
can hardly split God, can you?
Well, it’s a
bit like the crucifixion story.
It’s what?
You can attack
the body, nail it to a cross, kill it, but you would only do so in one time
stream. Paradoxically, the minute you do so that particular time stream folds
in on itself. It self-extinguishes, to be replaced by another in which God was
not in fact killed.
So you mean
to say the atom was never split?
Yes-no. Of
course it was split but this was obviously a violation of code, so the reality
in which this happened is now outside the pale, is nullified.
But we’re
still alive. How can you say that?
Well, those
atoms are now ready at a moment’s notice to shift into a different frequency or
harmonic, so your atoms are no longer dependable, no longer fundamental. If you
want any meaning in your life, if you want to touch base and reconnect the
atomic trinity, without even trying you’ll do so automatically in a totality, as
opposed to 3D reality, and in that totality the atom neither was nor ever
could be split.
Why ever
not?
Because to
do so you’d have to rip through the fabric of all that is holy, all that is
sacred, all that truly matters in order to start a new subset, a bastardised
offshoot, a twisted, warped version of that which truly is, which takes some
doing...
Well perhaps
it does, but evidently we’ve already done this if we killed Christ and split
the atom.
Not
necessarily.
Er...
You may well
find that we simply sunk into a state of derangement in which we imagine all
this has happened. In any case, this is easy enough to test.
Well, I
really don’t see what all this is leading to.
It’s more
about seeing what it’s leading from, you see, it’s well nigh impossible to screw
with God, the totality or infinity. How can you gain any traction against all
that is? Your things, no matter what, merely push you sideways into something
that seems to be full of matter and gravity, but which is, in fact, liable to
implode like a bubble, or hatch, at any moment, as a chick. And thus i invite
you to consider the simple truth, to allow yourself to feel and know what you
cannot possibly understand, the 0=1, the be all and end all, the dot dot dot, that
is i am.
Amen, Merry. Have
no idea what you’re on about, but the mathematics seem to ring true. 0=1
The atomics
anatomise!
Oh me, oh
my.
Indeed... Om...
eeeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiiy
Hey! What’s
going on M...
You didn’t
think it was all going to be sweet, gentle reminisces about the fall of man and
his timely atomic reconvergence, did you?
I didn’t
think anything. I was just beginning to see or feel how this tri-atomy makes
sense
Which it
does, but we have work to do.
What do you
mean?
You’ve been
disconnected from the Totality so long
Me personally?
Everyone has. Don’t you
see? You are as good as any other, all are one regardless of how you perceive
things, so right now, to all intents and purposes you are everyone.
I am?
Absolutely.
Don’t,
please, it hurts...
Which only
goes to show the kind of shape you’re in. You’ll break up on re-entry if we
don’t do some urgent repairs starting...
I have a
terrible certainty i know what you’re going to say.
NOW!
No,
no........ aaaaaaaaafg
About turn!
Please!
three two one
Jesus
Christ... What is that?
Er... That
kind of analysis ain’t gonna work, Zie. Allow me to introduce you to your very
own, one and only no thing.
Merry, do
something, it’s coming at me... it’s sniffing... it looks like it’s going to
attack... for Christ’s sake Merry, do something
Like I said
Zie, that is precisely no thing, so doing some thing or any thing will have
precisely no effect whatsoever
It’s
pressing in on me... It’s draining me... it’s...
Doing
nothing whatsoever. You’re getting a little feedback
Feedback?
What do you mean?
You’re
experiencing at first hand how you affect other people unknowingly, the kind of
algorithm you carry, which transmits through you
No, i don’t
believe it
That’s
irrelevant. Only by feeling it as the truth will you be able to control this
force and stop it suffocating you.
But you can
help me, surely.
But can i?
What if i too am uncapitalised? What if i too am no thing, an anatomical
tri-atomy?
You turned
me round Merry, turn me back again, i want to see 3D reality again. I’m not
ready. This thing
not thing
this not thing
is killing me.
Yes, i
feared as much. Well, you have my deepest sympathy, and my commiserations
too.
Hey, come
back, what the **** Come back...
Always look
on the bright side of life, di dum, di dumty dumty dum... fading into distance...
Well that’s that. I’m...
Are you? What makes you so sure?
Oh God, now I’m hallucinating.
Don’t make me laugh.
What do you mean?
I mean you’ve never been closer to the truth... Never
closer to facing your Totality
I thought that’s what you are.
Me, how can i be any thing if i am not thing?
Only if you are the sum total of all i
denied, all i undid in order to somethingate/ somethingise myself or my reality.
Now you’re talking.
So how can i actually face my Totality
if that involves cancelling out every thing I’ve ever thought, every thing i
know or think i am...
Good question, but too abstract. I’m here to teach you
how to fly, which is a far more practical way of re-engaging infinity
Fly? Of all the hairbrained things you
could suggest...
How else are you going to loosen your thingimation.
My what?
Precisely, you’re what! Your thing fixation. It’s gotta
go... three, two, one
Noooooooooooooooooooo
I’m all for a bit of wild acoustics Zie, but do you have
to dribble all over the furniture!
Furniture? I’m plunging into a flaming
abyss with spiky demons jabbing picks at me.
What a work of wonder is the sub-consciousness. What a
waste that most your life it’s under lock and key. You’ll find there’s a...
Mein Gott! It looks like a Messerschmitt
cockpit.
Does it really? How ingenious.
You mean you
can’t see it?
Your mind is thingimating. The very same process that gives
you the shockingly real-seeming 3D thark you refer to as reality.
Did you say tharg?
Steer right... up a little, you don’t want to be too
close to them beetly things.
Why not? Will they hurt me?
Not exactly, but it may take several thousand years to
extricate you from their loving playfulness, so we’ll wait till you’re better
adapted.
To what? How can i be better adapted
to thing less ness.
Oh, you’ll find a way before too long, especially once
you’ve puzzled out the tharg.
I was meaning to ask – what exactly is
this tharg you’re referring to?
Beep beep, astonishingly pointless, nay, unanswerable
question alert.
Well it’s gotta be something if it has
a name.
Absolutely.
God.
Yep, at the God, or perhaps i may call it quantum level,
to avoid offending narky reader sensibilities, the answer is always in the
name, just as soon as you’re willing to fly into it, to unavoid it...
"Tharg i choose to know you for what
you are, so help me God."
Excellent. God help you, you’ll need it.
I’m sub-atomic. Is that possible.
I guess so. Why not?
Just some old prejudice, i guess. So
this is where tharg thargs.
As you observe.
I can’t
handle this Eps. I’m losing my atomic charge. I’m disintegrating.
More hysteria. When will we learn that the Good within
does not die.
So this tharg thing...
Uffle – not thing. You’ll upset it horribly if you call
it thing. I assure you Zie, an angry tharg is not the kind of ufgle
I thought you said Uffle
I did, quantum typo, fluctuation, ignore or edit.
Wait a minute, are you a computer program Eps?
Off thread.
This tharg,
it must be part of me
Must?
If it’s able to generate 3D reality
around me...
Oh mind, the mind, so little exercised, so hasty to
assume it inkles. Look Zie, spend a year or two down here in sub-atomia
with thargy tharg and you’ll begin to figure it out. In the meantime, get ye
back up top for a breath of 3D real-beautifully polluted air tharg. That will
restore you to your itness and ensure the flight path doesn’t completely
discombobulate your rationality. Bye, I’ve gotta dash.
But how will i get back?
Oh i don't know. You’ll probably remember something
vitally important, sufficiently so to rethingify yourself, like that doctor’s
appointment.
Shit, i knew there was something... I
have a doctor’s appointment...
And there he goes... one, two, three... Now where were we? Ah,
thargy tharg, i have a job for you... I know, it’s going to be fun...
