Thursday, December 15, 2016

did i vow el


i'm stepping into time 
you know
take it slow
low
take it slow
i'm 
stepping into time 


oh 1
oh 01
oh 010
my nh dh


never say you want 
to know
unless you're 
pause
unless you're
paused
unless you're 
ready 
to grow into 
it

between words
i slip 
silently up-wards
into space-ful-ness
i smile 1
smile 01
ile 010 longingly
v


try
if you can
try to be
gaily 1
gaily 01
gaily 010
all the way 
back to me
your motherlode
of inner-ness
inner-sense
of inner-peace 
bliss
me
nothing less

did i tell you 
how 
slow
you share
slow
my birth
her
my breathe
her
my breath
her
did i tell you 
how we merge
in star-ful-ness
and light
before vow-
els and con-
sonants collide
in blackest
blockest
shine

i step aside 1
i leave 01
the rest 010
to you
her you
to el
to al
to ul
see



Saturday, December 3, 2016

walking the bounds


I'm walking the bounds of C3
amazing how we took it for granted
we always assumed con-sciousness
had to be there for us - as long as we were alive
only now, as we watch things collapsing into 
an apocalyptic apoplexy of non-sense
we realise that she's giving us a nudge
she's hinting that perhaps it's time 
for us to revise our approach
to things

so the thereness of things is now in question
and by things we include people, nations
organisations, ideas and words
they're all landmarks in the mindscape of mind
all cross-referenceable, and to a certain extent
tradeable
all things are things - no matter how high
they may appear to be

so now that we've realised that things
have a function, serve a purpose
to keep enthralled the 3D mind
the mind of matter
forever tail chasing what cannot be caught
what cannot be commoditised or traded
as thing
the elusive
omnipresent
isness of be
stop

time to walk the bounds of 
C3
time to bite the bullet of con-sciousness
to unload millenia of prevarication and prejuidice
to accept once again the primacy of is
the fabled
legendary
isness of be
instead of abasing oneself unthinkingly 
at the altar of things 
and the high altar of thing it-self
instead of assuming we're far from being
all that it takes to be 
complete
to shift the mountains of matter
which accumulate
around about
back into the void
of no matter
no thing
nought is
i am

stop

Descartes postulated famously
I think therefore I am
which seems perfectly logical
to the rational mind 
until you step back and see the wood from the trees 
I think, so far so good
but how does thinking prove
that I am?
there is a huge leap from thinking to I am
which becomes less egregious 
if instead we say
I think therefore I think I am
this is far more logical
for thinking can only prove 
the thought experience of being alive
it cannot, does not prove life itself
to do so you need to take one step back
to go from thinking 
back to the direct experience of being alive
but we don't do so, do we?
we seem to be satisfied with thought
as if thinking is sufficient proof
as if thinking will do
what Descartes was really saying if truth be told
is  thinking satisfies me that I am alive
and who can blame him? we are so wrapped up
in the thinking stream of thought machine
the rational mind, that it seems absurd to take it any further
to doubt the reliability, the primacy, the veracity of thought
and thus I think therefore I am is both diagnosis and the measure 
of our unthinking and willful belief 
in the ascendancy, the supremacy of  thought 
as if thought is what makes us human
what sets us above all other creatures whom
we believe, are unable to think as we do
this is the extent of our complacency
but fortunately, if our complacency is ill-founded
then the powers-that-be regulating all that is
will provide us with ample opportunity to see 
how misguided and mistaken our assumptions are
they will enable us to confront and reassess the error
of our 3D logical belief that thought is neutral and transparent
that thinking enables us to cut through to the heart of matter
that thought can and does give a clear and reliable picture
of what simply is
Supposing this assumption this belief is utterly wrong
supposing thought can do nothing of the sort
supposing thought which seems to be all encompassing to us
down here in 3D is actually one-sided, intrinsically partisan and prejudicial 
that it naturally and inevitably devolves towards matter or material things
that it cannot and will not confront the fundamentals as they simply are
but only views them as they affect things manifesting here in 3D.
May seem that there's little or no difference between the two - after all
we know a lot about the wind by observing how it affects a kite or sail
and yet the wind is different from how it affects material objects
it can and does have other qualities
it may in some way be alive, a spirit, though it pains me 
to use such a word, and that at the primary level 
of con-sciousness - if i bother to investigate, I can and will
find that the wind does not blow randomly or impersonally
but imparts some kind of data or knowledge or information
to me as it blows - if I have ears to hear

I'm not saying Descartes was wrong
he was right - he correctly formulated 3D reality
in which it pleases us to think that thinking is proof enough 
that I exist, and thought, we'll probably accept, may be 
nothing more than a chemical process in the brain
In this case you're a thing living in a world of things
move on please, nothing further to be seen here

But what happens when we finally emerge from what I'm
terming 3D, materiality, if and when we're ready to evolve,
to climb out of the box, to engage a different way of thinking
a different way of experiencing reality?
Suddenly we find ourselves in terra incognito. 
Suddenly we begin to realise that our thoughts
the very process of thinking is part of the problem,
part of what has been keeping me down
holding me back, preventing me from emerging from 
the mind of things that matter, the mind that likes
to assume it's nothing more than a think box
a thought machine - that it goes no further - that 
it has no direct interface with things in general,
with the universe, with reality, with 
all that is
If and when this notion starts to seem preposterous,
if and when it starts to seem absurd that we do not,
cannot affect the course of things by the very
thoughts we think,
if and when we start to sense that thoughts are only
a tiny fraction of what our greater mind, our multi-dimensional
or quantum mind is capable of - that there's infinitely more
if we're willing to investigate, if we're willing to
walk the bounds of C3, to test for ourselves the hypothesis
and see whether it stands up to scrutiny or not.
If, doing so, we discover that our mind is more like
a two way transmitter
if we discover that our greater mind is more like 
an interface connecting us directly with everything
and anything - then the game has changed
irrevocably. We no longer can treat thought
the way we used to - as the grand arbiter of what is what
for once we engage the direct field of con-sciousness
we're no longer at liberty to differentiate 
one thing from another
all things, as all roads lead to Rome
come back to, flow into, and through me
Behold the continuum
Behold - the physics, the metrics,
the maths, the what-not of in-finity in which any attempt
to differentiate one from another
merely pushes me back down into 3D
back down into the mind of what is what
thus preventing me from going beyond
going above matter into the quantum state
of hyper-thing

This is not a theory
This is not a belief
This is 

What? the old mind of things and matter immediately asks
so observe, breathing the moment, the intense moment
in which you want to fix things down by thinking things
through rationally, all very good and proper
but irrelevant to our discussion
for what is where thought begins and con-sciousness
ends
what is where a process of creating, engineering, 
enmattering things in 3D leads you ever further 
down that path of making things matter no matter
what it costs, no matter what it takes
and the price is high - for failure to evolve
failure to embrace the isness of C3
is failure to test the hypothesis
failure to discover where life now is
where life is now leading
where life is flowing inexorably
back 
back
back

I'm walking the bounds - 
for here at the edge of con-sciousness
here is where things get clear
where things start making sense
where I commence the process 
of discerning
distinguishing the wood 
the trees
the fullness of   is
seeing sense 
as opposed to 
seeing  things
activating the great
mind
the greater my nd
the quantum interface
i-drive - get yours now
infinity drive will take 
you places nothing else can
no thing can
beyond thing
into the hyper-state
of zero one
in which anything can be
either on or off
either what or not
depending on how you
relate to it
depending on you
on your state of 
conscious awareness
as you C3 your C3
as you I am 
your I am
as you begin the begin



Thursday, December 1, 2016

C3 of bubbles and string



here at the edge of con-
                                       sciousness  
                                    i sense     C3
               the other                                              
      wholly ignored   rationally
 a  dark-seem realm of
  unperceived
undiscovered
                    hitherto un-manageable
          nought
                               of bubbles 
                                    strung  a-long


0=1




now is the time
i
paste myself to the board
of space-time curvature
i
 string myself up
                    on
 the washing line mind
to dry
                       thought


0=1





bubbles are neither gaps
between                             
                                  nor holes 
     in time flow stream circularity
                                are best seen as pockets of mirth
as irrepressible nought
erupting gaily
punctuating  fleetingly
the fabric of make-seem 
with effervescence 
                                     
                           
0=1




you think these are words
do you                                 
to read       comprehend
to think   through         
                                           – huish
   crystals       not words
                     i contend 
grown in saturated solution
 of silent unknown            
              silver essence of nought
                    i n f i n i t i n g s 
  of anything but
of not thought a-loud
to be
          

0=1




my fifth
concerns the human
being    bubbles and string
a mirror is all you require
to reveal the illusion
of things being things
me being me       
separately            
   completely
to re-mind your self
to re-be one          











Tuesday, November 29, 2016

of darkness and light be




Re-engaging nought

they talk about dark
matter, dark energy of
      the universe    they insist
inside-out their mind
is full of darkness
darkness                      dark
no-thing else
    nought besides
and yet i contend
that we are living proof
that we are in-deed 
creatures of light
that we               
straddle the con-
sciousness divide between
dark ness and light
contend i  that this 
darkest secret
within             
                       funda-mental paradox 
which we comprise
      con-tain
conceal bio-logically
                      is     dot dot dot
          unthinkably not
yet is

            know thyself
you are as I be 
Am 
embodiment of con-
sciousness embodiment of
dark ness and light
         feel the two
know the wavy
wiggly 
jagged line
at times     in places blurred 
when close at hand
or else sharply defined
when viewed from a-far

dark ness and light
breathing   dot   dot   dot
you cannot be 
one and not 
the other
you both are
you neither are
  for you  One are   be
singular  whole  complete
  and yet One is    nought be
with-out not one
  not thing
not me
unless darkness seeps up
through the floor cracks 
of  conscious mind
flooding it with 
dot dot dot
not what – breathe
unknown – breathe
unknowingness – breathe
        conscious Not – breathe
the shadow me
   shadow it
    shadow be
               indiscernibly

zero equals one
i contend
as breathe i be 
                            of breath 
both dark not-is and 
 light         
an   interplay       
interface
       inter-dance
be-tween the demon dark
and godly light with-in 
     me and     nought
unequivocally
through-out



Thursday, November 24, 2016

the broken table

Actually Zie, Norms are only one possible way of seeing beyond or around things.

Er... what do you mean?

Well, in-finity is not small, and there are always alternative routes.

Look Merry, it’s been bad enough coming to terms with norms – you’re not going to pull the rug from under my feet again are you?

What rug?

I was speaking figuratively.

Oh – but I like image. The rug can be pulled from under your feet but have no fear – there’ll always be another one to replace it. Nature, you know, abhors a vacuum, so just when you think the world is crumbling into dust – you’ll start to see another one that’s been waiting patiently in the wings.

I'm barely coping Merry. Experiencing norms has been...

Deeply unsettling.

Yes.

But of course it has. It’s more or less the same as dying. You have no idea how wedded to the solidity and finiteness of things you and your fellow humans have been.

Well perhaps there was a reason for that.

Indeed there was – for you are the great architects of splendid 3D reality – you call it – though technically we should refer to it as “normality” – the domain where norms make things seem real.

I’m getting that sick feeling again. I swear I’m going to puke... excuse me dear reader – vomiting noises can be heard off stage right.

This is getting ridiculous Merry – I can’t even look at things now without feeling queasy – knowing they’re just norms masquerading as things. I’m even starting to smell that normy smell. I can’t believe I never noticed it before.

Astonishing isn’t it – the power of ignorance – our ability to ignore what we don’t wish to confront.

Well I’d rather not spend the rest of my life running to the toilet – so unless you can think of something pretty soon, I’m going to do my utmost to forget I ever heard about norms, or you, for that matter.

Like I said, Zie, norms are only one level of how we can see things.

Like I said Merry – I don’t care.

There’s another level which you will almost certainly find easier to stomach.

Yes?

Yes.

Well, what are you waiting for?

The right moment.

Well let me know when you’ve found it. I’ve got a lot to do – I’ve got literally thousands of things to try and avoid making eye contact with, and I need to sign up for the self-help group Vomiters anonymous. Apparently there are lots of people like me who just vomit as a kind of nervous reaction to something too shocking to handle.

Calm yourself Zie. Practice the breathing exercises I showed you. Now.

Zie starts breathing and evidently shifts into another level of C3 – er – that’s Merry’s name for consciousness.

Good. Now how do you feel.

Good, thanks. It’s bizarre how I can swing like that.

Quite normal...

Don’t say that word – please.

What? Normal?

No, no, no, no – it’s making me queasy again.

Merry does some Daoist looking moves – tapping Zie swiftly at various points and once again Zie is calm and collected.

I’m hopelessly unstable Merry.

You were rooted in 3D – now you’re re-establishing yourself in a deeper reality which you haven’t yet got the feel for. Patience. This is the time of the nurturing, nourishing breath. Only breathing yourself back to centre, back to awareness can help the transfer complete. In fact, once you’ve got a feel for the power of breath, you’ll never waste your time with chat or thought in the same way again. Your breath gives you an instantaneous feedback – you can feel and read the pulse of the universe, the heart beat of in-finity with or through the breath, once you start becoming aware of its vast potential.

It’s certainly expanding hugely of late. I can honestly say I never found it particularly interesting just sitting there breathing and looking at things, or thinking things through from the perspective of breath – noticing how my thoughts altered the flow, the intensity or direction or some other quality of the breath.

Good.

So what were you telling me about, before I started panicking?

Oh – well you’ve dealt with the norms – and that’s obviously a huge shock to the system. Humanity has relied on the fact that things are just things. Looking at them another way – as if they are alive, and actually seeing an entity – called a norm – behind, within or attached to each and every thing – is a death blow to the 3D mind’s totalitarian control.

Whoa – you call it totalitarian control! Isn’t that a bit extreme?

No, not in the least. It had to be totalitarian – how else were you going to create 3D out of in-finity?

Well... I don’t know what you mean?

Well in-finity is infinitely slippery – because its open ended – it has neither beginning nor end – so where or how can you create a limited system of things – when you’re coming from an unlimited isness – a quantum field or a stream of consciousness?

Oh – now that you put it that way – I don’t know. How did we get things to materialise from in-finity?

It’s like Big Bang – isn’t it. It obviously involves a massive head blow to consciousness – er – C3.

How do you mean?

Well, 3D has to be a state of unconsciousness or limited consciousness or limited awareness – that way things can seem to be just things – because as long as you’re fully conscious – things are inseparable from all else – which means they’re so much a part of the whole that they cannot really be differentiated in any way, shape or form.

So they don’t exist – as long as we’re fully conscious! Amazing!

Yes. So Big Bang might be referred to as Big Concussion, and within that concussion we haven’t quite figured out who we are, where we are or how. As long as we’re groping around trying to join the dots – we have these things popping up in our C3 filling the gaps, because...

Nature abhors a vacuum. But why does it have to be Norms?

It doesn’t – that’s just one level – but it’s a good starting point, isn’t it?

Explain.

Because one of the preoccupations of modern man and modern thought is that things are kind of dead – relative to you organic beings.

Well yes – that makes sense given the fact that tables tend not to walk around or change shape.

Actually it makes sense because the minute you allow things to be conscious or alive – the whole of 3D comes crashing down, which is why your scientists almost universally refuse to consider, study or discuss C3 – even the doctors, for crying out loud!

Yes, it is somewhat strange – but I expect it’s just because C3 is hard to measure or quantify.

Believe me – if your scientists are willing and able to name and discuss things they have no real conception of such as black holes, dark matter and dark energy – without which their models of the universe collapse – then they could happily do the same for C3, but they won’t under any circumstances, because the 3D mind knows who its real enemy is, and will avoid it at all costs – even if it has to destroy the entire population of the earth. It’s a little tyrant that will not brook opposition -  so no one is allowed to introduce C3 to the field of legitimate scientific enquiry.

So how come you can get away with it?

Zie, remember again that we are discussing in-finity – and that in-finity has no beginning or end. Big Bang may have severely concussed humanity – yet humanity remains a part of C3, like it or not, and in-finity always has a trick up its sleeve, an undiscovered variable or an unknowable unknown that will pop up when least expected to restore the perfect order of randomness and chaos to proceedings. This is why no “enemy” is ever really an enemy – merely testing and aiding your development. Without an adversary everything would grind to a halt.

Oh, don’t say that Merry – you’ll make me suspect you’re one of those...

One of what? Oh – a death eater.

Yes.

Breathe it – how does it feel?

Silly.

Ok – let the breath do the talking and thinking – otherwise you’ll end up walking in endless mental circles of misty doubt and fearful confusion.

Ok. I’m breathing.

Well, the Norms are real enough – but given the nature of in-finity – which cannot be limited in any way, nor determined absolutely or fundamentally – this means that Norms are but a version, but an interpretation, but a representation of something else – a superstate – in which things and you...

Are one.

Good thinking.

Not thinking.

Good breathing then. It’s working beautifully, isn’t it.

So what I’m breathing is that the Norms are in some respects a projection of my personness – my C3, into and onto the things which are actually part of all that is me.

Excellent. But how can things be “part of all that is you?” That makes no sense.

I know Merry – but that’s how the breath presents it. As I breathe I don’t just breathe for myself, within myself – I breathe for everything and through everything – so in terms of breath I appear to be indistinguishable from all that is. This, I guess, is where C3 really comes into its own.

Excellent. So the Norms to a fearful unbreather could be something demonic and terrifying – a monster hiding in the cupboard of each and every thing – the ultimate Halloween nightmare.

But to the breather it’s more about feeling C3 extending throughout.

Music to my ears Zie. So what about the finities?

Breathing tells me that the finities are like crystallisations of nought – the zero point – which are present throughout – also fully connected into C3’s whole hearted ministry of love and onefulness.

Oh – you make it sound so spiritual.

Well, that’s how it breathes. In practice – the finities are a less personal, more mathematical way of relating to things – connecting to them from the bottom up – from the sub-atomic level. They are, if you like, the fairies of the quantum stream as opposed to the macro, top down spirit of things in general.

Ah ha. Your breath is truly surpassing itself today, Zie. So when would you choose to connect with the finities?

Whenever you like – whenever you feel like being on that side of the equation, on that side of the atomic scale. It’s more a matter of mood, or poetic licence, after all, we are all creators – not just technicians, and some people will obviously feel more comfortable working with finities than norms, but as long as we’re breathing C3fully we’ll tend to keep moving between one and t’other – that way keeping ourselves more or less balanced, more or less open to both sides of experience, both ends of the spectrum.

Because if we practised the dark arts and became one sided – like people who have completely ruled out C3, then sooner or later we ourselves become victims of our own self-imposed idiocy.

Yes – that’s how it breathes. The people causing most harm in the world have simply given up on one side – especially if they’ve done blood sacrifice – and paradoxically – all the evil they may perpetrate passes through the apparent victim – even when they kill or maim – coming back to themselves.

Explain – you mean the victim doesn’t die.

Only in 3D – which merely splits at that point in time – and the victim is cut and pasted back in the unsplit main line of 3D.

So the death eaters never succeed in killing anyone.

Not really. It appears to be a Voldemort situation. They only really succeeded in horcruxing themselves, until their me field becomes unstable and crashes.

Fascinating. Thanks Zie. I’m going to put you back now – and Merry repeats the Daoist taps and blows – leaving Zie hyperventilating fiercely.

What was that for Merry?

Oh – I needed to calm you down. You were freaking out about something.

Was I?

By the way Zie, have you figured out how to mend the broken table yet?