walking the bounds

I'm walking the bounds of C3

amazing how we took it for granted

we always assumed con-sciousness

had to be there for us - as long as we were alive

only now, as we watch things collapsing into 

an apocalyptic apoplexy of non-sense

we realise that she's giving us a nudge

she's hinting that perhaps it's time 

for us to revise our approach

to things

so the thereness of things is now in question

and by things we include people, nations

organisations, ideas and words

they're all landmarks in the mindscape of mind

all cross-referenceable, and to a certain extent

tradeable

all things are things - no matter how high

they may appear to be

so now that we've realised that things

have a function, serve a purpose

to keep enthralled the 3D mind

the mind of matter

forever tail chasing what cannot be caught

what cannot be commoditised or traded

as thing

the elusive

omnipresent

isness of be

stop

time to walk the bounds of 

C3

time to bite the bullet of con-sciousness

to unload millenia of prevarication and prejuidice

to accept once again the primacy of is

the fabled

legendary

isness of be

instead of abasing oneself unthinkingly 

at the altar of things 

and the high altar of thing it-self

instead of assuming we're far from being

all that it takes to be 

complete

to shift the mountains of matter

which accumulate

around about

back into the void

of no matter

no thing

nought is

i am

stop

Descartes postulated famously

I think therefore I am

which seems perfectly logical

to the rational mind 

until you step back and see the wood from the trees 

I think, so far so good

but how does thinking prove

that I am?

there is a huge leap from thinking to I am

which becomes less egregious 

if instead we say

I think therefore I think I am

this is far more logical

for thinking can only prove 

the thought experience of being alive

it cannot, does not prove life itself

to do so you need to take one step back

to go from thinking 

back to the direct experience of being alive

but we don't do so, do we?

we seem to be satisfied with thought

as if thinking is sufficient proof

as if thinking will do

what Descartes was really saying if truth be told

is  thinking satisfies me that I am alive

and who can blame him? we are so wrapped up

in the thinking stream of thought machine

the rational mind, that it seems absurd to take it any further

to doubt the reliability, the primacy, the veracity of thought

and thus I think therefore I am is both diagnosis and the measure 

of our unthinking and willful belief 

in the ascendancy, the supremacy of  thought 

as if thought is what makes us human

what sets us above all other creatures whom

we believe, are unable to think as we do

this is the extent of our complacency

but fortunately, if our complacency is ill-founded

then the powers-that-be regulating all that is

will provide us with ample opportunity to see 

how misguided and mistaken our assumptions are

they will enable us to confront and reassess the error

of our 3D logical belief that thought is neutral and transparent

that thinking enables us to cut through to the heart of matter

that thought can and does give a clear and reliable picture

of what simply is

Supposing this assumption this belief is utterly wrong

supposing thought can do nothing of the sort

supposing thought which seems to be all encompassing to us

down here in 3D is actually one-sided, intrinsically partisan and prejudicial 

that it naturally and inevitably devolves towards matter or material things

that it cannot and will not confront the fundamentals as they simply are

but only views them as they affect things manifesting here in 3D.

May seem that there's little or no difference between the two - after all

we know a lot about the wind by observing how it affects a kite or sail

and yet the wind is different from how it affects material objects

it can and does have other qualities

it may in some way be alive, a spirit, though it pains me 

to use such a word, and that at the primary level 

of con-sciousness - if i bother to investigate, I can and will

find that the wind does not blow randomly or impersonally

but imparts some kind of data or knowledge or information

to me as it blows - if I have ears to hear

I'm not saying Descartes was wrong

he was right - he correctly formulated 3D reality

in which it pleases us to think that thinking is proof enough 

that I exist, and thought, we'll probably accept, may be 

nothing more than a chemical process in the brain

In this case you're a thing living in a world of things

move on please, nothing further to be seen here

But what happens when we finally emerge from what I'm

terming 3D, materiality, if and when we're ready to evolve,

to climb out of the box, to engage a different way of thinking

a different way of experiencing reality?

Suddenly we find ourselves in terra incognito. 

Suddenly we begin to realise that our thoughts

the very process of thinking is part of the problem,

part of what has been keeping me down

holding me back, preventing me from emerging from 

the mind of things that matter, the mind that likes

to assume it's nothing more than a think box

a thought machine - that it goes no further - that 

it has no direct interface with things in general,

with the universe, with reality, with 

all that is

If and when this notion starts to seem preposterous,

if and when it starts to seem absurd that we do not,

cannot affect the course of things by the very

thoughts we think,

if and when we start to sense that thoughts are only

a tiny fraction of what our greater mind, our multi-dimensional

or quantum mind is capable of - that there's infinitely more

if we're willing to investigate, if we're willing to

walk the bounds of C3, to test for ourselves the hypothesis

and see whether it stands up to scrutiny or not.

If, doing so, we discover that our mind is more like

a two way transmitter

if we discover that our greater mind is more like 

an interface connecting us directly with everything

and anything - then the game has changed

irrevocably. We no longer can treat thought

the way we used to - as the grand arbiter of what is what

for once we engage the direct field of con-sciousness

we're no longer at liberty to differentiate 

one thing from another

all things, as all roads lead to Rome

come back to, flow into, and through me

Behold the continuum

Behold - the physics, the metrics,

the maths, the what-not of in-finity in which any attempt

to differentiate one from another

merely pushes me back down into 3D

back down into the mind of what is what

thus preventing me from going beyond

going above matter into the quantum state

of hyper-thing

This is not a theory

This is not a belief

This is 

What? the old mind of things and matter immediately asks

so observe, breathing the moment, the intense moment

in which you want to fix things down by thinking things

through rationally, all very good and proper

but irrelevant to our discussion

for what is where thought begins and con-sciousness

ends

what is where a process of creating, engineering, 

enmattering things in 3D leads you ever further 

down that path of making things matter no matter

what it costs, no matter what it takes

and the price is high - for failure to evolve

failure to embrace the isness of C3

is failure to test the hypothesis

failure to discover where life now is

where life is now leading

where life is flowing inexorably

back 

back

back

I'm walking the bounds - 

for here at the edge of con-sciousness

here is where things get clear

where things start making sense

where I commence the process 

of discerning

distinguishing the wood 

the trees

the fullness of   is

seeing sense 

as opposed to 

seeing  things

activating the great

mind

the greater my nd

the quantum interface

i-drive - get yours now

infinity drive will take 

you places nothing else can

no thing can

beyond thing

into the hyper-state

of zero one

in which anything can be

either on or off

either what or not

depending on how you

relate to it

depending on you

on your state of 

conscious awareness

as you C3 your C3

as you I am 

your I am
as you begin the begin