Um, I've been meaning to say...
Yes? What?
Um, i am line dot field
Line, dot, field? Er... not sure I understand.
No need
No need?
None. You cannot understand what you've never experienced.
No?
No. You can't understand what's outside your frame of reference.
?
You only understand things by bringing them in.
Yes? What?
Um, i am line dot field
Line, dot, field? Er... not sure I understand.
No need
No need?
None. You cannot understand what you've never experienced.
No?
No. You can't understand what's outside your frame of reference.
?
You only understand things by bringing them in.
Well what's stopping me?
Ah
Ah?
You see line dot field is 3 to your D.
3 to my D?
Precisely... You can only understand things that fit within the system, not things that do not.
Oh, so 3D is line dot field, you're saying?
Yes, it's equivalent.
So I can't understand it.
Correct, no.
But you do.
No, how can I, unless i have advanced beyond the system.
But how can you advance without understanding what you're doing?
Good question.
Well?
It shouldn't be possible
But it is?
Not
Not?
Not, it is not
It's not possible?
Possible, it is not
Er, I'm having a lost in translation moment.
Yes, i noticed
Well, perhaps you could assist?
No, as in yes, it is possible not
With no full stop? That makes a difference, doesn't it?
Yes, for the full stop indicates you're working within a closed system, a subset of 3D
Oh, it does?
Affirmative, whereas the open end leaves space for nought to interface and interact consciously
Now wait a minute
Yes?
You can't say that nought interacts consciously!
Correct, within 3D i cannot but beyond 3D i can not say things positively as there's a kind of antigravity effect, and things start shifting phase or jumping frames or whatever it takes to keep nought fully engaged
Nought fully engaged? You make it sound as if it's an active player?
Ah, now you're talking, and the question we might of course ask is whether nought is any less than you or me
Well that's a no brainer, isn't it?!
Yes, it is
Nought is obviously the absence of...
matter, consciousness too
Now wait a minute, if nought were conscious you'd hardly be able to refer to it as nought, would you?! It would be something, wouldn’t it?
Not if you were essentially unconscious, a mere golem of consciousness attached to a physical form, in which case you only focus on the what matter aspect of things, rather than consciousness itself
But how can you suggest we're not conscious?
i can't, but i can suggest we are not yet consciously nought, only consciously this or that
Oh!
indeed, and as such we are not yet embracing the magic, the beauty of line dot field that is i be nought, as opposed to I am period.
line dot field... if only I knew how
if only, or onely, as it used to be written, i knows, regardless of how...
Oh
o will do
No comments:
Post a Comment